ChaseDream
标题: GWD5-Q38,没讨论过! [打印本页]
作者: Sophia0703 时间: 2008-7-12 11:44
标题: GWD5-Q38,没讨论过!
GWD5-Q38Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic converters, devices designed to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions, have been required in all new cars in Donia since 1993, and as a result, nitrogen dioxide emissions have been significantly reduced throughout most of the country. Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high, nitrogen dioxide emissions there have showed only an insignificant decline since 1993.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the insignificant decline in nitrogen dioxide emissions in Donia’s capital city?
A. More of the cars in Donia’s capital city were made before 1993 than after 1993.
B. The number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993.
C. Pollutants other than nitrogen dioxide that are emitted by automobiles have also been significantly reduced in Donia since 1993.
D. Many Donians who own cars made before 1993 have had catalytic converters installed in their cars.
E. Most car trips in Donia’s capital city are too short for the catalytic converter to reach its effective working temperature.
不明白题目中的only是什么作用,怎么解释?
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic converters, devices designed to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions, have been required in all new cars in Donia since 1993, and as a result, nitrogen dioxide emissions have been significantly reduced throughout most of the country. Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high, nitrogen dioxide emissions there have showed only an insignificant decline since 1993.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the insignificant decline in nitrogen dioxide emissions in Donia’s capital city?
A. More of the cars in Donia’s capital city were made before 1993 than after 1993.
B. The number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993.
C. Pollutants other than nitrogen dioxide that are emitted by automobiles have also been significantly reduced in Donia since 1993.
D. Many Donians who own cars made before 1993 have had catalytic converters installed in their cars.
E. Most car trips in Donia’s capital city are too short for the catalytic converter to reach its effective working temperature.
不明白题目中的only是什么作用,怎么解释?
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-12 14:28:02编辑过]
作者: zeayin 时间: 2008-8-24 08:01
only 表示 仅仅, 我明白E 能都解释矛盾, 但是D似乎也不错啊~
作者: cecilia025 时间: 2009-7-20 21:40
如果是d,则会让emission的decline更大,不能explain为何emission的decline是insignificant的.
e说明,因为大多数车开的里程太短,以至于不能让车里的converter达到可以最有效工作中的温度,也就是说,converter一直是在低效率工作,不能有效的减少emission的排放,解释了问题。
作者: jerry0yy 时间: 2009-8-12 00:08
如果是A呢,旧车比较多,好像也可以解释排放量没有明显下降啊。
作者: superbblife 时间: 2009-8-13 14:25
A选项和原文是矛盾的,原文已经说了Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia's capital city has always been comparatively high
作者: waytodream 时间: 2010-1-1 14:42
Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high
这句话应该是说 在donia's capital city 里的新车比例相对于上一句的 most of the country 来看算高的吧,是capital city和其他地方比,但并不能说明 在capital city 本身 而言新车比旧车多吧,A> 没有E> 好,但本身应该不是 和题目相悖的吧?? 还请NN说明。
作者: jackiehuang 时间: 2010-10-14 15:17
说下自己看法,做题时选了D,但是是我看错语法了。。。直接把D理解为很多拥有1993年以前的车的车主在93年之前已经装了XX仪器。。所以当时觉得是对的。。但其实D的内容是很多拥有1993年以前旧车的车主在法令出来后装了装置,就是说93年以后donia新车也有装置,老车也有装置,那废气的排放量必定是大大减少,而不是题目中说的没有显著减少
只是提醒下可能跟我犯了一样错误的童鞋
作者: C擦亮眼 时间: 2010-10-29 12:52
是 insignificant 不significant
作者: saish 时间: 2010-12-31 23:16
有没有人觉得D是对的= = 我就同意有旧车车主自己在1993年以前就装了converter。。。
这个比E make sense吧。。。
PS 我今天才开始准备。。。菜鸟一只data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fbb3/4fbb3616e2a0fb9cb7e5fd3308e4d469e2b00d3d" alt=""
作者: melvinperson 时间: 2011-1-1 11:42
个人愚见 欢迎同学们指正
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic converters, devices designed to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions, have been required in all new cars in Donia since 1993, and as a result, nitrogen dioxide emissions have been significantly reduced throughout most of the country. Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high, nitrogen dioxide emissions there have showed only an insignificant decline since 1993.
(注意题目里表明了两个范围:1。 D国全国的车 2。D国首都的车)
题目:D国全国的车污染物有明显下降;首都(虽然有很多93年以后的车)但是污染物缺没有大幅度下降。
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the insignificant decline in nitrogen dioxide emissions in Donia’s capital city? 解释为什么首都汽车污染物没有大幅度下降?(主要紧扣:解释下降的程度和首都的汽车)
A. More of the cars in Donia’s capital city were made before 1993 than after 1993.
(A选项:我第一次读感觉有点乱,先保留,作为怀疑选项)
再读A选项:题目中给出了93年车在首都的保有量很高。但是这里说的是"Made". 93年之前Made的 不一定现在还有很高的保有量。有点偷换概念。
B. The number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993.
(B选项:首先,没有紧扣首都车的这个范围。如果93年后的车sold降低,和A选项类似,偷换概念)
C. Pollutants other than nitrogen dioxide that are emitted by automobiles have also been significantly reduced in Donia since 1993.
(C选项:跳出“首都汽车”的范围,同时也跳出了Nitrogen污染物的范围,不考虑)
D. Many Donians who own cars made before 1993 have had catalytic converters installed in their cars.
(D选项:这里说的是Donians,乍一看有道理,但其实跳出了首都的这个范围,如果把D选项的范围改小到D国首都有车人,还沾边)
E. Most car trips in Donia’s capital city are too short for the catalytic converter to reach its effective working temperature.
(E选项:我选E。路程短,converter没有效果,所以去除污染物的效果不明显。紧扣了污染物和首都汽车)
我个人觉得很多时候选项那个正确与否都是相对而言的,这里看E最容易讲通。
谢谢大伙 大家一起讨论
作者: lonelyorchid 时间: 2011-1-2 18:52
个人愚见 欢迎同学们指正
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic converters, devices designed to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions, have been required in all new cars in Donia since 1993, and as a result, nitrogen dioxide emissions have been significantly reduced throughout most of the country. Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high, nitrogen dioxide emissions there have showed only an insignificant decline since 1993.
(注意题目里表明了两个范围:1。 D国全国的车 2。D国首都的车)
题目:D国全国的车污染物有明显下降;首都(虽然有很多93年以后的车)但是污染物缺没有大幅度下降。
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the insignificant decline in nitrogen dioxide emissions in Donia’s capital city? 解释为什么首都汽车污染物没有大幅度下降?(主要紧扣:解释下降的程度和首都的汽车)
A. More of the cars in Donia’s capital city were made before 1993 than after 1993.
(A选项:我第一次读感觉有点乱,先保留,作为怀疑选项)
再读A选项:题目中给出了93年车在首都的保有量很高。但是这里说的是"Made". 93年之前Made的 不一定现在还有很高的保有量。有点偷换概念。
B. The number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993.
(B选项:首先,没有紧扣首都车的这个范围。如果93年后的车sold降低,和A选项类似,偷换概念)
C. Pollutants other than nitrogen dioxide that are emitted by automobiles have also been significantly reduced in Donia since 1993.
(C选项:跳出“首都汽车”的范围,同时也跳出了Nitrogen污染物的范围,不考虑)
D. Many Donians who own cars made before 1993 have had catalytic converters installed in their cars.
(D选项:这里说的是Donians,乍一看有道理,但其实跳出了首都的这个范围,如果把D选项的范围改小到D国首都有车人,还沾边)
E. Most car trips in Donia’s capital city are too short for the catalytic converter to reach its effective working temperature.
(E选项:我选E。路程短,converter没有效果,所以去除污染物的效果不明显。紧扣了污染物和首都汽车)
我个人觉得很多时候选项那个正确与否都是相对而言的,这里看E最容易讲通。
谢谢大伙 大家一起讨论
-- by 会员 melvinperson (2011/1/1 11:42:26)
总的来说,你对GMAT的逻辑掌握的不错。并不是所有的选项都有逻辑,换句话说,GMAT有很多选项是无关选项比如B,销量根本就和排放无关,C 其他污染物和N的排放也无关。
A,混淆视听。旧车多怎么了?原文说首都的新车比例相当高,说明其他地区的旧车更高,但仍然减排效果明显。不能解释
D,没关系。装催化器的旧车全国都有,为啥首都就没有减排效果?
E,这答案看起来太舒服了~ 原文说减排是由于有催化器,E说,你那个催化器在首都的日常行车中没用。多帮呀这答案,直截了当
作者: kevinyin 时间: 2011-2-13 17:24
标题: 看到六楼的解释,发现犯了同样的错误。学习了!谢谢!
看到六楼的解释,发现犯了同样的错误。学习了!谢谢!
作者: ellawene 时间: 2011-7-1 18:31
D很简单啊!!!真不明白为神马很多人都觉得D对~
D是解释不了原文,跟原文的情况正好相反
题中说政府要求1993年后生产的新车都要装转换器
D说的是1993年前的车也装了那个神马转换器
那么结果就是尾气都能被消除,而不是少部分减少,而应该是大部分减少。
跟文中最后的现象相反。
作者: rikihsu 时间: 2011-8-22 22:43
果然我也是把D的语法看错了。。
作者: 长亭更短亭 时间: 2011-9-9 11:50
个人愚见 欢迎同学们指正
Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic converters, devices designed to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions, have been required in all new cars in Donia since 1993, and as a result, nitrogen dioxide emissions have been significantly reduced throughout most of the country. Yet although the proportion of new cars in Donia’s capital city has always been comparatively high, nitrogen dioxide emissions there have showed only an insignificant decline since 1993.
(注意题目里表明了两个范围:1。 D国全国的车 2。D国首都的车)
题目:D国全国的车污染物有明显下降;首都(虽然有很多93年以后的车)但是污染物缺没有大幅度下降。
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the insignificant decline in nitrogen dioxide emissions in Donia’s capital city? 解释为什么首都汽车污染物没有大幅度下降?(主要紧扣:解释下降的程度和首都的汽车)
A. More of the cars in Donia’s capital city were made before 1993 than after 1993.
(A选项:我第一次读感觉有点乱,先保留,作为怀疑选项)
再读A选项:题目中给出了93年车在首都的保有量很高。但是这里说的是"Made". 93年之前Made的 不一定现在还有很高的保有量。有点偷换概念。
B. The number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993.
(B选项:首先,没有紧扣首都车的这个范围。如果93年后的车sold降低,和A选项类似,偷换概念)
C. Pollutants other than nitrogen dioxide that are emitted by automobiles have also been significantly reduced in Donia since 1993.
(C选项:跳出“首都汽车”的范围,同时也跳出了Nitrogen污染物的范围,不考虑)
D. Many Donians who own cars made before 1993 have had catalytic converters installed in their cars.
(D选项:这里说的是Donians,乍一看有道理,但其实跳出了首都的这个范围,如果把D选项的范围改小到D国首都有车人,还沾边)
E. Most car trips in Donia’s capital city are too short for the catalytic converter to reach its effective working temperature.
(E选项:我选E。路程短,converter没有效果,所以去除污染物的效果不明显。紧扣了污染物和首都汽车)
我个人觉得很多时候选项那个正确与否都是相对而言的,这里看E最容易讲通。
谢谢大伙 大家一起讨论
-- by 会员 melvinperson (2011/1/1 11:42:26)
顶,讲得很清晰,是我看的最好的解释
作者: caoqin1981 时间: 2011-9-30 16:47
解释的很细
作者: HilaryYsm 时间: 2013-4-27 23:33
what about B? could anyone here explain it to me? I think if the number of new cars sold per year in Donia has declined slightly since 1993, then pollution gas would be declined less. Am I wrong?
作者: 丁牙草 时间: 2013-7-20 22:58
melvinperson 发表于 2011-1-1 11:42 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4ed5/f4ed5de0987d6774f034fc0f159ddee2c974d7e5" alt=""
个人愚见 欢迎同学们指正Nitrogen dioxide is a pollutant emitted by automobiles. Catalytic conve ...
说的太好了!!谢谢!
作者: jiaoying526 时间: 2013-9-3 17:35
cecilia025 发表于 2009-7-20 21:40 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4ed5/f4ed5de0987d6774f034fc0f159ddee2c974d7e5" alt=""
如果是d,则会让emission的decline更大,不能explain为何emission的decline是insignificant的.e说明,因为 ...
严重同意!1
作者: huan8438 时间: 2013-11-26 22:18
什么玩意啊。 D根本不挨着好么。 我是纠结在E和A了 我总觉得trip to the city 不能代表大部分新车在这个capital city。 外面的车对本市的影响应该小。但貌似是体会错了。是没有真正看懂。 我当时做题看成了most of 所以感觉A很对。但我现在看MORE OF 那这个原因的影响就非常小。 D 根本不挨着。要是他们都按上了那个device 肯定decline不会是是insiginificantly。 明显是立刻排除的选项。
作者: qinage 时间: 2014-2-7 21:23
补充自己的恍然大悟:
题目问的是:虽然首都的新车比例相对高,但污染却没怎么减少?
这个问题是在基于首度的新车作为一个整体,来做前提的。 故迅速派出A。
A的问题在于缩小了范围:——将完整的集合分成子集加以比较
与各位分享,希望帮助所有像我一样纠结 A E的人data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a26e2/a26e20202ac4909b99a1557651e4d41fcee407ff" alt=""
作者: Victoriagirl 时间: 2014-3-6 18:01
jackiehuang 发表于 2010-10-14 15:17 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4ed5/f4ed5de0987d6774f034fc0f159ddee2c974d7e5" alt=""
说下自己看法,做题时选了D,但是是我看错语法了。。。直接把D理解为很多拥有1993年以前的车的车主在93年之 ...
说的好
作者: junior01 时间: 2017-1-3 10:22
A 错是因为文章中已经写了the proportion of new cars in Donia's Capital city has always been comparatively high, 但是show insignificant decline. 注意always 而A选项中说的就违背了原文给的前提,所以错。我是这样理解的。。。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |