ChaseDream

标题: GWD-18-Q30,未讨论过 [打印本页]

作者: chenkai    时间: 2008-7-8 16:47
标题: GWD-18-Q30,未讨论过

GWD-18-Q30

The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease.  The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil.  This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.  Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

 

A.      Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.

B.       Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.

C.      Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.

D.      Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.

E.       Typhus is generally fatal.

answer B, i choose D, actually, didn't really understand the puzzle...can anyone guide and give a chinese translation? thx!


作者: rpch2004    时间: 2008-7-20 12:44

本人观点:

Tetracycline作为抗生素,可以抵制疾病typhus的发生。但是,Tetracycline的有效,必须建立在假设:在将(含有丰富的能够生产Tetracycline的细菌的)谷物制造成食物bread and beer的过程中,抗生素Tetracycline没有失去效用。否则,他将不能抵制疾病typhus的发生,推翻结论。

将D取非,其他食物也可以产生抗生素Tetracycline不能推翻结论


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-20 12:45:18编辑过]

作者: lilyCD    时间: 2008-10-29 20:51

我也选的D


作者: linuxzh    时间: 2008-11-17 11:18

其实最近发现很多的assumption 题有一个解题方法,

Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

所以选项中一般是对这个论述的取非选项是正确的.

B.       Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer

 其他很多关于其他名词的陈述多为迷惑选项.

welocme discuss.


作者: soyabo    时间: 2009-2-12 17:49
以下是引用linuxzh在2008-11-17 11:18:00的发言:

其实最近发现很多的assumption 题有一个解题方法,

Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

所以选项中一般是对这个论述的取非选项是正确的.

B.       Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer

 其他很多关于其他名词的陈述多为迷惑选项.

welocme discuss.

D不对,因为结论中的tetracycline in their food 已经淡化了Bread和Beer

但是请教楼上LS,我感觉support和conclusion题的取非很常见,assumption怎么取非啊

能不能结合本题仔细解释一下,感激不尽O(∩_∩)O~


作者: zhengjingzhe    时间: 2009-7-18 18:46
up
作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-20 09:35

作者: fiona_hq    时间: 2009-7-30 23:41
up
作者: fiona_hq    时间: 2009-7-30 23:46
up
作者: boum    时间: 2009-8-2 17:18
up
作者: suyu77    时间: 2009-9-26 10:45
以下是引用linuxzh在2008/11/17 11:18:00的发言:

其实最近发现很多的assumption 题有一个解题方法,

Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

所以选项中一般是对这个论述的取非选项是正确的.

所谓的取非不能乱用,那不靠谱,还是应该TEST具体答案来判断吧,要不又成猜题了,这乃CR大忌!!!因为ETS会把正确答案都放在一个题中,不同的题选不同的,没有绝对万能选项,大家要注意啊!!!!!!!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/26 10:45:37编辑过]

作者: jan625    时间: 2009-9-26 11:14
XDF老师说,对于有NOT的选项进行取非,如果对结论构成削弱那就是选项~这种题型叫做defender的假设~这道题你对B一试一下就知道是B了
作者: cnzalieen    时间: 2009-10-15 18:06
支持B
作者: yuanyuan1990    时间: 2012-11-18 10:42
主要强调的是 in food,所以B对这个的其他可能(做食物)进行排除。我觉得这好多逻辑都抓准结论就好了。
作者: zqjoy9    时间: 2014-8-3 11:31
仔细想一下D, 如果该假设成立的话,那么也必须有B的成立:

D 中说,啤酒和面包是唯一含有Tetracycline的食物,但是“含有Tetracycline”不等于“Tetracycline能发挥其作用”,因为,就像B 中所说的,万一在制作啤酒和面包的过程中使Tetracycline变得无效了,那么即使啤酒和面包中含有再多的Tetracycline,也没有办法抵抗疾病的产生。
因此,如果选D,那么其实已经基于的B的假设来选的,追根溯源,还是选B~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3