The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million, which is part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the office color-printing market.
(A) million, which is part of a deal that will make
(B) million, a part of a deal that makes
(C) million, part of a deal making
(D) million as a part of a deal to make
(E) million as part of a deal that will make 选E
One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years, amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing the first significant change in the fuel efficiency of any class of passenger vehicle in almost two decades.
(A) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and representing
(B) amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, and it would represent
(C) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and it would represent
(D) an increase that would amount to roughly five miles per gallon and would represent
(E) which is an increase amounting to roughly five miles per gallon, representing 选D
两题形式差不多，考同位语用法，但是为什么上面一题语法笔记上说，同位语就近修饰million不行 但下面一题又可以用 an increase指代整件事呢？ 恳请指教
还有一题类似的指代问题 答案E中who 不会指代了US吗？ 因为我记得有一题语法笔记是用这样的指代错误杀掉的……
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.
(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
那B呢 为什么不能用同位语呢？
同位语有几种结构;BY说的....
1. 名词性同位语. n.., n; n,a/an +N, the, +n, n
$950 million, a part ( 根据NN 们的总结, 这样的同位语两个东东必须完全对等..)
可是, LZ 反问一下自己, a part 和 million 能对等吗? ..这里是不可以的..
我做的的时候也错啦.. 后来想想明白啦.
2. 概括性同位语, 用一个概括性的词去概括前面解释的对象: a program/information/an effort/ a practice that.....
an increase 在第二题中就可以概括性的说明前面的东东...所以, 可以用an increase
------关于, (D) million as a part of a deal to make (E) million as part of a deal that will make D, E 我也想了半天... 后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义.. 原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make E 中却没有这个缺陷.
(D) million as a part of a deal to make
(E) million as part of a deal that will make
D, E 我也想了半天...
后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义.. 原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make
E 中却没有这个缺陷.
同位语有几种结构;BY说的....
1. 名词性同位语. n.., n; n,a/an +N, the, +n, n
$950 million, a part ( 根据NN 们的总结, 这样的同位语两个东东必须完全对等..)
可是, LZ 反问一下自己, a part 和 million 能对等吗? ..这里是不可以的..
我做的的时候也错啦.. 后来想想明白啦.
2. 概括性同位语, 用一个概括性的词去概括前面解释的对象: a program/information/an effort/ a practice that.....
an increase 在第二题中就可以概括性的说明前面的东东...所以, 可以用an increase
------关于, (D) million as a part of a deal to make (E) million as part of a deal that will make D, E 我也想了半天... 后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义.. 原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make E 中却没有这个缺陷.
(D) million as a part of a deal to make
(E) million as part of a deal that will make
D, E 我也想了半天...
后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义.. 原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make
E 中却没有这个缺陷.
(D) million as a part of a deal to make
(E) million as part of a deal that will make
D, E 我也想了半天...
后来觉得, to make 放在这里有歧义.. 原来应该是修饰DEAL 的, 可是, 在C中, 变成表目的啦, purchase to make
E 中却没有这个缺陷.
我觉得这里的a part of a deal不是第一种同位语却是第二种:就是指代前面整个公司的收购事件The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million是DEAL的一部分,这样的话B是不是就成立了?
请大家讨论!
我觉得这里的a part of a deal不是第一种同位语却是第二种:就是指代前面整个公司的收购事件The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million是DEAL的一部分,这样的话B是不是就成立了?
请大家讨论!
恩恩 谢谢大家指教 我做的时候也是这样想的…… 就是第二种同位语的用法 同位语指代前面整件事，撇开时态的不讲，这里时态真是错了……没看到 汗……
up
prep上面说million 与deal 不对等, million是个number, 要同位的话是应该用a number....的
lz的第二个例子中, an increase 就可以指代前面的内容了 increase the average fuel efficiency of its sport utility vehicles by 25 percent over the next five years,
我不明白的是第一题中为啥不选d呢?
prep的解释说to make的修饰对象有问题? 这点上我不是很明白
我依然觉得deal是指purchase的，作为概括性同位语总结前面叙述的事件有点不合情理：作为协议的一部分，一个announcement可以帮助公司make it the largest manufacturer in the market? 反正我觉得是有点别扭的，还是purchase作为deal的一部分使公司成为业界巨头比较容易理解，符合惯常思维。而且作为business agreement，deal在很多情况下是尤指buy and sell这种行为的协议，也就是交易。
不过最开始我还是差点选了B，也是把a part of a deal作为概括性同位语来看。但是原句的时态如果没有明显错误，最好是不要改动的。B中的makes不好，也不太符合逻辑——我的理解是，要整个deal完成了，公司才成为the largest manufacture，这里有一个时间先后顺序。
open to discuss
我同意
不过，能不能给解释一下C啊？
个人理解，C 中分词making表示动作的进行强调动作，
在本句中，making没有进行的意思，deal用从句修饰更好
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |