ChaseDream

标题: TTGWD2-Q15,B选项未讨论过。。 [打印本页]

作者: chenkai    时间: 2008-7-2 04:51
标题: TTGWD2-Q15,B选项未讨论过。。

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare tokens be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city’s low-income residents.  Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

A.      Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase.

B.       Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

C.      The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders.

D.      The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city’s bus system.

E.       Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

answer C, I can understand, but why B is wrong? thx


作者: gaixia0528    时间: 2008-7-2 14:23

我觉得

可能是因为文章中没有提到other riders

Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than by the 18-token

好像更合理一些 我也做错了这道题, 所以不敢确定


作者: smilecrystal    时间: 2008-8-12 23:32
文章推理是:因为 $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders,所以应该采取9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00的策略。
问上面推理的假设。

B.      
Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders. 文中没有出现other riders,所以这个比较无意义,无关;

    


作者: tjy15    时间: 2008-8-26 23:45

有没有人和我一样觉得C选项说了跟没说一样的?


作者: shaoqiye    时间: 2008-8-27 05:53



绝对正确的话一般都是废话~~~

作者: 基范1987    时间: 2008-11-21 22:12

对,我就是觉得,完全等于没说,害我都没敢选


作者: fajinca    时间: 2009-1-1 16:09
一下子拿出20块钱对低收入家庭来说是一笔不小的支出。换成10块钱一套就相对好点。再举个例子,比如可支配收入只有15块钱,就买不起20块的套票了,只买得起10块的。

最低门槛从20块降到10块。

作者: jean1280    时间: 2009-6-20 17:01
up
作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-8-1 14:56

作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-8-1 14:58

c 就像是屁话一样


作者: pwss    时间: 2009-8-4 20:34

作者: 赋格    时间: 2009-11-22 22:44
C是典型的NOT WEAKEN。
作者: 小羽羽    时间: 2010-10-21 22:09
虽然C是P话,但是正确的,典型弱智题
B,Low-income riders would be more likely totake advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.
属于新概念,文中未出现不可臆断


作者: 小伊YSY    时间: 2011-9-20 00:48
B说lower-income riders更能take advantage of savings afforded by the 9-token offer than other riders,这个偏题了,因为题目讨论的是是否能更好支付,而不是是否更好利用省下来的钱,并且other riders是个无关概念
作者: myaska    时间: 2011-10-3 14:10
考场上要是碰到这题我肯定吓得不敢选C……
作者: kjia0120    时间: 2012-7-20 17:48
都过去那么多年了
作者: kjia0120    时间: 2012-7-20 17:48
依然觉得这题真白痴
作者: lorinlee    时间: 2012-8-20 07:34
B说lower-income riders更能take advantage of savings afforded by the 9-token offer than other riders,这个偏题了,因为题目讨论的是是否能更好支付,而不是是否更好利用省下来的钱,并且other riders是个无关概念
-- by 会员 小伊YSY (2011/9/20 0:48:22)



恩,如楼上所说,B项提到一些原文没有的要素。而C项里只有原文提到的要素,而且对比比B项更直接




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3