2008-06-19 AWA
"People often complain that products are not made to last. They feel that making products that wear out fairly quickly wastes both natural and human resources. What they fail to see, however, is that such manufacturing practices keep costs down for the consumer and stimulate demand."
Which do you find more compelling the complaint about products that do not list or the response to it? Explain your positision using relevant reasons and/or examples drawn from your own experiences, observations, or reading.
Many people consider that products which do not last long are wastful not only natural resources but also human resources, and correspondingly,some agree that some products althouth not last long but those product most of time also cost low correspondingly. And such low-cost product help the proverty to have a basic life or make their life easier. In this case, I shall prosent arguments favoring statement .
For example, panel furniture are a classic example for the products which not last long but are cheaper thatn wood furniture. In China, solid wood furniture are about 3 times of panel furniture. And solid wood furniture can last about 30-70 years, but panel furniture last about 3-7years. Considering natural resources, panel furniture made by wood shavings and sawdust, they don't need to use many natural resources, but solid wood furniture need plenty of tree . As a result, in this case, panel furniture which not last long actually save our natural resources, on the other hand, the laster one will used plenty of natural resources.
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |