ChaseDream

标题: 关于than后面是否可以直接接介词短语的问题? [打印本页]

作者: xiaoda    时间: 2008-6-19 16:06
标题: 关于than后面是否可以直接接介词短语的问题?

代表题目之一:GWD1-Q16

Q16:

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

  1. a greater proportion than it was

  2. a greater proportion than

  3. a greater proportion than they have been

  4. which is greater than was so

  5. which is greater than it has been

答案是B,因为A和C后面接的单复数和时态都有问题所以选B.

代表题目之二:OG-102

102Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaignsit had provisions for only twenty-four days

(A)  they had in their previous campaigns

(B)  their previous campaigns had had

(C)  they had for any previous campaign

(D)  in their previous campaigns

(E)  for any previous campaign

Agreement + Verb form

The sentence incorrectly uses the plural pronouns they and their to refer back to the singular noun armyThe verb tense would need to be the past perfect had had rather than the simple past had because this action occurs before the action in the main clauseIn the context of supplies for a campaignthe preposition for is preferable to the preposition in . In cases such as thiswhere the sentence has multiple errorsit is often helpful to look among the answer choices for an alternate construction

A  Pronouns referring to the noun army should be it and itsnot they and their the verb should be had had

B  Their does not agree with the singular noun army.

C  They does not agree with the singular noun armythe verb should be had had.

D  The proposition used should be for, not intheir should be its to agree with army

E  CorrectThis simple construction avoids the problems of pronoun agreement and verb tenseit is clear, correctand concise

The correct answer is E

请NN指教!


作者: xiaoda    时间: 2008-6-20 10:26
怎么没有人呢…… 请NN指教一下! 非常感谢!!
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-20 10:26:39编辑过]

作者: dingxiang    时间: 2008-6-20 10:48

可以接啊, 为什么不可以呢?

楼主提的这两个题目都是一个类型,就是状语比较, 因为是状语比较, 所以第二个结构中主谓都可以省略,而不会产生歧义

而且第一题中也不是用排除法排除A/C而来的

A/C中的代词都有问题, 即使要用这样的形式也要是than those in xxx


作者: xiaoda    时间: 2008-6-20 15:33
以下是引用dingxiang在2008-6-20 10:48:00的发言:

可以接啊, 为什么不可以呢?

楼主提的这两个题目都是一个类型,就是状语比较, 因为是状语比较, 所以第二个结构中主谓都可以省略,而不会产生歧义

而且第一题中也不是用排除法排除A/C而来的

A/C中的代词都有问题, 即使要用这样的形式也要是than those in xxx

就是状语比较, 因为是状语比较, 所以第二个结构中主谓都可以省略,而不会产生歧义

那就是说,做"比较型"的SC的时候,关键是要弄清楚到底被比较的对象是什么…… 有些是比较主语、宾语;有些是可以比较状语……。是这样吗? 谢谢!


作者: dingxiang    时间: 2008-6-20 16:06

是这样的,比较首先要搞清楚比较的成分, 然后再根据比较成分是主语比较,  宾语比较, 或者状语比较

状语比较就是你举的例子, 所以可以把主谓全部省略

主语比较必须补足助动词

具体可以见一片精华贴" 比较的刨丁解牛" (好像是这个名字拉)


作者: xiaoda    时间: 2008-6-21 14:40

非常感谢!






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3