ChaseDream

标题: GWD-28-12引申出并列谓语的用法疑问 [打印本页]

作者: mmm734    时间: 2008-6-13 17:53
标题: GWD-28-12引申出并列谓语的用法疑问
 
Over the next few years, increasing demands on the Chattahoochee River, which flows into the Apalachicola River, could alter the saline content of Apalachicola Bay, which would rob the oysters there of their flavor, and to make them decrease in size, less distinctive, and less in demand.
A.
 
A. which would rob the oysters there of their flavor, and to make them decrease in size
B.B. and it would rob the oysters there of their flavor, make them smaller
C.C. and rob the oysters there of their flavor, making them decrease in size
D.D. robbing the oysters there of their flavor and making them smaller
            
E.E. robbing the oysters there of their flavor, and making them decrease in size
 
答案是D,伴随状语。但我想问,究竟象C这种结构, could do...., and do....是可以还是不可以的呢?是不是之前一定不能有逗号?
 
 
我当初选C的原因是觉得alter the saline content和rob the oysters是并列的动作,当然后面的decrease in size是不好的用法了。
 
谢谢

作者: mmm734    时间: 2008-6-14 17:40

还是有疑问,顶一下,究竟....do...., and do...这种句式在GMAT中是否ok?

因为看了很多语法解释都是and、but之类做连词连接两个句子(主句),必须是完整的句子(有主语)

但印象中又记得某些笔记说当主语明显一致时,可以省略。。。

究竟是怎样的呢?还是4天考试了,请大家指点啊


作者: 混乱思维    时间: 2008-11-21 08:44

帮着顶一下,我也做错了


作者: dashuiniu    时间: 2009-7-14 11:07

句子的未划线部分出现了less distinctive, and less in demand,说明前面也应该是个比较级跟它们平行。只有B、D符合,然后B的错误很明显,it指代不清,make也用得不对。

自己的理解,不知道对不对,欢迎讨论。


作者: BLinging    时间: 2009-7-14 11:40
making them decrease in size 这种说法肯定是awkward的,这道题的重点平行是在后面的比较级,-er,less,and less。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3