ChaseDream

标题: 深度挖据OG10th 128(og11th 80) [打印本页]

作者: kaisertse    时间: 2008-5-30 16:47
标题: 深度挖据OG10th 128(og11th 80)

128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of pro­ducing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.

(A)  requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties

(B)   requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C)  requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties

(D)  application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties

(E)   irrigation and application of commercial fertil­izer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

这道鸟题十分有意思,兄弟我觉得是把修饰问题挖据的淋漓尽致。

首先,拿到题目,我们先用动词优先,杀A,B,C。再把剩下两个选项比较,发现就是两个关键名词位置不同。再细心一看,发现一个是was,一个是were,立刻明白到,D中的required by earlier high-yielding varieties只修饰irrigation,而E中的required by earlier high-yielding varieties修饰两个关键词irrigation和appication,根据忠于原文的规定,杀D,让required by earlier high-yielding varieties修饰两个关键词。

这个杀法很爽。哥们再深度挖掘一下,觉得这条题要捕捉的ETS出题思路是修饰这个问题。

看A选项,首先,用costly修饰requirements就不合逻辑,其次,earlier high-yielding varieties只是修饰了application,同样,B,C和D也犯了同样错误,不是只修饰requirements,就是只修饰了irrigation。

大家觉得是不是这样?欢迎拍砖。


作者: 烟雨情越    时间: 2008-5-30 21:12

用costly修饰requirements就不合逻辑吗?能不能翻译成是需要付出很高代价的需求呢?

嘿嘿,偶是新手,刚看语法还不到一个星期,要是不对,欢迎大家拍~






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3