ChaseDream

标题: 请教:Prep2-2 [打印本页]

作者: Braveboy2008    时间: 2008-5-27 09:44
标题: 请教:Prep2-2

2.         (24209-!-item-!-188;#058&001071)

 

In the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the United States acquired 828,000 square miles for about four cents an acre, which more than doubled the country's size and that brought its western border within reach of the Pacific Ocean.

 

(A) In the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the United States acquired 828,000 square miles for about four cents an acre, which more than doubled the country's size and that brought

(B) For about four cents an acre the United States acquired, in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, 828,000 square miles, more than doubling the country's size and it brought

(C) With the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, the United States acquired 828,000 square miles for about four cents an acre, more than doubling its size and bringing

(D) The United States, in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, for about four cents an acre, acquired 828,000 square miles, more than doubling the country's size, bringing

(E) Acquiring 828,000 square miles in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the United States bought it for about four cents an acre, more than doubling the country's size and bringing

答案说D选项“, bringing

” 的修饰对象由歧义,而C选项“and bringing

”没有, 我不太明白???, 因为“,Bringing" 也不能够修饰the country's size ,吧、那不它就是得修饰主句的谓语吗???


作者: dingxiang    时间: 2008-5-27 13:45

对阿, D的bringing是歧义, 可以修饰其紧跟的size, 也可以作状语修饰 acquire

这里从逻辑意思角度明显是acquire有两个结果: double和bring, 所以将这两个分词用and连接


作者: Braveboy2008    时间: 2008-5-27 23:26

Ding


作者: kiid    时间: 2008-5-28 01:53

楼主看下prep1-4,写的很好,多个修饰成分修饰主语常用方法:分词结构+主语+修饰1+修饰2+谓语……而且做og发现有一条规律是,修饰语最好紧跟被修饰词,这样子的选项最不容易引起歧义。你看d中bringing和The United States隔了千山万水的,十有八九有问题


作者: ad264    时间: 2008-5-28 08:21

    

dingxiang 已经讲出重点了



补充一下,more than doubling...是 adv modifier
而楼主也读出 bringing 也是应该要修饰主句的 modifier

用逗号,通常是逗号的是附属位置,可能是前句的果、解释、或是目的。
用and表示意思平起平坐

如果这一点你比较难接受的话,另一个D很奇怪的地方就是

for about four cents an acre

故意拆解acquire
sth for
for变成插入句,与acquire关系远了也怪了。

只要找出一个选项致命的错误排掉就好啦

作者: aeoluseros    时间: 2008-11-5 00:34
以下是引用dingxiang在2008-5-27 13:45:00的发言:

对阿, D的bringing是歧义, 可以修饰其紧跟的size, 也可以作状语修饰 acquire

这里从逻辑意思角度明显是acquire有两个结果: double和bring, 所以将这两个分词用and连接

ing短语放在最后前面还有逗号会做定语修饰插入语里的东西吗?

我认为不尽然...

我看倒是有可能跳跃插入语作定语修饰828,000 square miles。

或者说两个相同功能的状语之间是应该加and的。

open to discussion


作者: stevenT    时间: 2008-12-24 23:40
more than doubling 修饰的是 828,000 square miles,而brining修饰的是acquire。把两个分词短语当伴随状语用and连在一起。是我百思不得其解的地方。如果说more than doubling是修饰acquire, 那就变成了acquire more than doubling it size, 逻辑上怎么解释? 难道只要是分词短语,无论修饰对象是谁都可以合并在一起? open to discuss

作者: snowlemon    时间: 2009-2-21 02:42
我看了看og11-4和og11-71,分别使用了double和doubling.
如果要修饰828,000 square miles,就应该跟og11-4一样,是不是就应该直接用double,而不是doubling呢?
而这里的doubling跟og11-71是一样的,应该是修饰前面整个句子,那逻辑上跟bring是并列的了。
个人浅见,望指正


作者: smartsky11    时间: 2009-3-20 10:31

作者: vivian0331    时间: 2009-7-14 00:26
doubling and bringing 并列的伴随状语?
作者: zliycwn1    时间: 2009-8-19 11:12

doubling和brining都是用来修饰买地整件事的,因此现在分词作为伴随状语

这题就表示两个分词可以一起并列做状语的


作者: 没办法1987    时间: 2009-9-4 15:36
以下是引用stevenT在2008/12/24 23:40:00的发言:
more than doubling 修饰的是 828,000 square miles,而brining修饰的是acquire。把两个分词短语当伴随状语用and连在一起。是我百思不得其解的地方。如果说more than doubling是修饰acquire, 那就变成了acquire more than doubling it size, 逻辑上怎么解释? 难道只要是分词短语,无论修饰对象是谁都可以合并在一起? open to discuss

more than doubling 修饰的不是828,000 square miles

这个句子是说:US获得了**平方米土地,(这件事情)使其面积翻倍and 将其边界扩张

两个doing分词都是作伴随状语,前面是因,后面是果,作用是相同的


作者: larryhsing    时间: 2009-10-7 14:22

判断句末的分词短语是伴随状语还是定语是否还是要优先考虑逻辑意思?


作者: ageng    时间: 2009-11-20 22:24
, more than doubling 谁能解释下这是个什么用法?分词作伴随状语么?那more than又是什么词性,修饰什么的?
作者: shanefeng    时间: 2009-12-24 00:48
, more than doubling 谁能解释下这是个什么用法?分词作伴随状语么?那more than又是什么词性,修饰什么的?
-- by 会员 ageng (2009/11/20 22:24:09)


Here are my thoughts:

According to what I found, most of the time ", more than" modifies the N or the core of Ns in front of it. There are couple of questions in Prep-1.

For sure, more than... modifies the 828,000 ^2 miles. The bringing could modify 828,000^2 miles or the whole event--acquisition. To make it clear, more than and bringing have to be connected by "and".
作者: wtylys    时间: 2011-8-1 21:42
谁能说说E中的“it”的指代问题。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3