ChaseDream

标题: 求问:GWD-TN23-Q2: PP48. [打印本页]

作者: CatBoboan    时间: 2008-5-17 15:30
标题: 求问:GWD-TN23-Q2: PP48.

Q2: PP48.

Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Pasco del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.

A.        Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio

B.        Unlike the river in many cities in the United Stated, which is no longer the local point of urban life, in San Antonio the river

C.        Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life, unlike San Antonio, where it

D.        In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San Antonio

E.         No longer do many cities in United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river

答案是E,我的困惑是D


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-17 15:31:57编辑过]

作者: mengtingw    时间: 2008-5-20 06:41

我当时也选错了-如果要从答案理解就是,D的选项是 城市地点+河流 比较 河流+城市地点,不符合对称原则吧。。。还是胡猜的。。。记答案好了。。


作者: fogwind    时间: 2009-2-6 12:16
****FW******
the correct answer here is still pretty ugly, so let's criticize the four incorrect choices.

choice a:
faulty comparison:
'unlike many u.s. cities, ... the river in san antonio...' --> can't compare cities to a river

choice b:
comparison isn't so good:
the second part should start directly with 'the river' (instead of 'in san antonio the river...'), so that the comparison is more clear.
much more importantly, poor use of the relative pronoun 'which':
'...cities in the united states, which is no longer the focal point...'
relative pronouns like which, by default, refer to the noun that's closest to the left, which in this case is the united states. therefore, this relative pronoun is used in a way that's either ambiguous (if you allow it to potentially refer to other nouns) or just plain wrong (if you follow the rule strictly).

choice c:
faulty comparison again
'the river...' is being compared to san antonio.

choice d:
drastic change in meaning
this sentence has completely gotten rid of any reference to the concept of 'no longer'. while all the other sentences say that things have changed, this sentence presents the situation as if it's always been that way.

作者: alibaba_2009    时间: 2009-8-5 07:58
UP
作者: onboard    时间: 2010-6-16 20:35
up
作者: 笑脸多多1003    时间: 2010-8-14 02:18
up
作者: brenda47    时间: 2011-3-14 19:08
up
作者: annie900319    时间: 2011-7-5 13:07
我觉得答案都不太对额。。。
E前半句的主语是city啊。。。后半句是river。。。
这样可以比么?
作者: jameshzd    时间: 2011-7-5 13:35
but 前后 不需要严格的对称啊~but 用法中并没有规定前后的句子要 主语一致啊~
作者: jamesch    时间: 2011-12-18 21:21
我认为D错在a river,前面提到说in few U.S cities 那么后面应该是rivers复数
作者: wildmantomba    时间: 2012-1-3 10:49
The explanation of 2nd floor is pretty good.
作者: mattam    时间: 2012-9-3 19:01
D改变了句意是不是?!原意是说其他城市的河流不再是核心,而D改变原意
作者: qiuhua01234567    时间: 2012-9-15 20:02
回看了下确实改变句意。。有人告诉我为什么要倒装么?倒装在G里不是完美的表达。。
作者: twingkey    时间: 2012-10-11 16:21
感觉D项想通过few和today的组合来表达no longer的意思(我觉得no longer包含today的意思...不知道对不对),但肯定没有no longer精确&concise,至于E为啥要用no longer开头,可能是为了更加强调对比关系吧~
作者: kikiff8    时间: 2012-11-15 10:02
D 用了few并不是全然的否定,而是数量少的惊人,但依旧有这样城市,既把河流作为城市中心的城市。

这样话跟后面的句子就无法形成对比了。句子原意是要对比的!
作者: andy2086    时间: 2013-12-5 16:25
*FW*的解释太精彩.
再次证明答案是比出来的. 找相对最佳的.而不是最完美的.
作者: 我不爱养宠物    时间: 2014-11-3 10:07
D的答案本来就是错的。

1.D选项反向说明原文句意,本来就不佳

2.我认为but 不合适,but表示转折,而前半句已经说了few blabla,那么用but就应该表示跟前面不一样,就是more如何如何,而此处but表示在SA不仅没有few,而且比few还few。。

个人意见,望大神评鉴。。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3