标题: 這樣解釋對嗎? [打印本页] 作者: GiGi 时间: 2004-1-3 23:16 标题: 這樣解釋對嗎? 258.During her lecture the speaker used map to clarify directional terms, for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that winds are designated by the direction from which they come. (A) or not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable (B) for everyone in attendance did not know (C) with everyone in attendance not knowing (D) with everyone attending not knowledgeable (E) for not everyone attending knew 請問(b)與(e)間不(b)是否是因為(e)較為簡潔?還是其他原因?作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-1-3 23:45
ETS-SC表示部分否定用not all，不用all....not作者: turtlechen 时间: 2004-1-4 03:40
(B) for everyone in attendance did not know 每個人都不知道 (E) for not everyone attending knew 並非每個人都知道 （有人知，有人不知）