ChaseDream

标题: PREP1-43 [打印本页]

作者: dancingcandy    时间: 2008-5-8 12:18
标题: PREP1-43

43.   (33475-!-item-!-188;#058&006874)

 

 

Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a top coat.  A new process requires no primer, but instead uses two layers of the same newly developed coating, with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat.  Using the new process instead of the old process increases the price of a new aircraft considerably.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that it is in an airline's long-term economic interest to purchase new airliners painted using the new process rather than the old process?

 

 

(A) Although most new airliners are still painted using the old process, aircraft manufacturers now offer a purchaser of any new airliner the option of having it painted using the new process instead.

(B) A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.

(C) A single layer of the new coating provides the aluminum skin of the airliner with less protection against corrosion than does a layer of primer of the usual thickness.

(D) Unlike the old process, the new process was originally invented for use on spacecraft, which are subject to extremes of temperature to which airliners are never exposed.

(E) Because the new coating has a viscosity similar to that of a traditional top coat, aircraft manufacturers can apply it using the same equipment as is used for a traditional top coat.

为啥选B呢?B的这句话A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.,主谓宾是啥啊?前边有个weighs后边又出来个would


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-8 12:19:27编辑过]

作者: xingxing23    时间: 2008-5-8 15:36

题目是问航空公司为什么要选择表面涂料价格更加贵的飞机(总的制造成本较高)。

B,说的是原来方法用的底漆比新的涂料要重,并且这个重量会产生一个很明显的影响,就是会降低飞机的载重能力。


作者: buda    时间: 2008-5-9 09:53

Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a top coat.  A new process requires no primer, but instead uses two layers of the same newly developed coating, with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat.  Using the new process instead of the old process increases the price of a new aircraft considerably.

 

老的飞机涂层有两层,一层primer,一层coat。新的飞机没有primer,但是有两层同样的新的coat。和老的coat同样厚同样重。使用新的涂层增加了新飞机的价格。

 

Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that it is in an airline's long-term economic interest to purchase new airliners painted using the new process rather than the old process?

 

(A) Although most new airliners are still painted using the old process, aircraft manufacturers now offer a purchaser of any new airliner the option of having it painted using the new process instead.

只是说新的涂层可以提供,并没有体现长期经济价值

(B) A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.

正确,新老涂层不同对于飞机降落承受能力影响也不同,所以还是考虑用新的

(C) A single layer of the new coating provides the aluminum skin of the airliner with less protection against corrosion than does a layer of primer of the usual thickness.

说新的不如老的好,所以削弱使用新的

(D) Unlike the old process, the new process was originally invented for use on spacecraft, which are subject to extremes of temperature to which airliners are never exposed.

说新的对于飞机来说不适用,削弱使用新的

(E) Because the new coating has a viscosity similar to that of a traditional top coat, aircraft manufacturers can apply it using the same equipment as is used for a traditional top coat.

并没有体现新的长期经济效用。只是说可以通用
作者: lanfeifeiYY    时间: 2009-5-25 09:51
B说老的涂层比新的重 不是和原文这句话矛盾么?"with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat”已经说明了两个一样重啊??
作者: lollypp    时间: 2009-5-26 12:08

原文是说新的涂层和top coat一样重,而b说primer涂层比新的又重,那两层新的重量当然小于primer涂层+top coat了啊。


作者: Brilliance    时间: 2009-7-23 09:17
求解
作者: kzhang2    时间: 2009-12-9 00:46
lollypp的解释很清楚了
作者: kzhang2    时间: 2009-12-9 01:03
E:是对飞机制造商的好处,而不是对航空公司的好处;
作者: rainbowmanutd    时间: 2010-3-20 16:15
B也没说有长期经济利益啊!
作者: rainbowmanutd    时间: 2010-3-22 14:11
求解,B没说长期利益~
作者: 山炮    时间: 2010-3-22 16:57
B 是说飞机承载能力 不同。也就是新材料意味着更多的载重-(和经济效益有关)。
E说的是aircraft manufacturers ,应该算无关选项。
作者: ziqi483    时间: 2010-9-25 00:09
B的言下之意就是新涂层可以提高load-bearing capacity,这不就体现long-term economic interest了吗?
作者: iSonic    时间: 2010-12-1 11:15
B是说新的方法使飞机的载重量增加了,这样不就可以赚更多钱了嘛。 buda B的翻译有问题,不是降落承重。
作者: bonfin    时间: 2011-10-30 16:16
B是说新的方法使飞机的载重量增加了,这样不就可以赚更多钱了嘛。 buda B的翻译有问题,不是降落承重。
-- by 会员 iSonic (2010/12/1 11:15:34)


thx
作者: xpyin    时间: 2012-2-7 10:01
Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a top coat.( 背景)  A new process requires no primer, but instead uses two layers of the same newly developed coating, with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat. (前提) Using the new process instead of the old process increases the price of a new aircraft considerably.(前提)
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that it is in an airline's long-term economic interest to purchase new airliners painted using the new process rather than the old process(结论)
简化一下:
旧:P+C;新:2C(新C=旧C厚重)
新比旧贵
结论:对于买飞机的人长期来说还是新的划算(注意是对谁划算)

选项:
(A) Although most new airliners are still painted using the old process, aircraft manufacturers now offer a purchaser of any new airliner the option of having it painted using the new process instead.
虽然大多数大多数飞机还是使用旧的喷漆,飞机制造商现在提供买新飞机的客户选择新的喷漆的机会。无关
(B) A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.飞机上的一层P比一层新的C重到可以影响到飞机的承重能力。如果新的解决了这个问题,对于购买者来说,新飞机可以装更多客户,即长期经济好处。
(C) A single layer of the new coating provides the aluminum skin of the airliner with less protection against corrosion than does a layer of primer of the usual thickness新C的在给铝皮飞机防止腐蚀保护方面没有老的P好,weaken.
(D) Unlike the old process, the new process was originally invented for use on spacecraft, which are subject to extremes of temperature to which airliners are never exposed.不同于老的,新的最初是用于造宇宙飞船的,能够抵抗飞机从来不会遭受的极端温度。不涉及经济好处,而且是飞机从来不会遭受,即使好没有用武之地。
(E) Because the new coating has a viscosity similar to that of a traditional top coat, aircraft manufacturers can apply it using the same equipment as is used for a traditional top coat.因为新的C有一层粘液,和老的C很接近,飞机制造商可以应用一样的技术。这里说的是制造商,无关。
作者: 1030430882    时间: 2014-4-27 13:39
这个需要脑子再转个弯,涂层轻了,那么载重就多了,把每次多余的载重产生的经济效益加起来,不就产生很大的长远利益了么我是这么理解的啦~
作者: qingping01    时间: 2016-9-1 08:43
好难想到重量和经济效益的关系啊     大家是怎么想到的??

作者: qingping01    时间: 2016-9-1 08:53
xpyin 发表于 2012-2-7 10:01
Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a  ...

解释的太棒了, 不得不手动点赞
作者: 笛安    时间: 2018-11-2 16:09
buda 发表于 2008-5-9 09:53
Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a  ...

谢谢!分析的好透彻!懂了!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3