ChaseDream

标题: gamt rule中，which能不能指代前面的整个句子？ [打印本页]

作者: hansomecd 时间: 2008-4-29 23:49
标题: gamt rule中，which能不能指代前面的整个句子？
同题目

作者: leogm 时间: 2008-4-29 23:58
不能，大多改用分词形式或者将which改为某个名词

作者: hansomecd 时间: 2008-4-30 00:13

谢谢leogm，但是在紫皮79 （og10th 38）中

38. Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.

(A) Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there

(B) Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings

(C)
Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity

(D) sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent
with the growth of industrial activity in the
area

(E) sediments from the Baltic Sea, consistent with the
growth of industrial activity there

在紫皮的解释中，有这么一句(指原句中，即A中)：As the sentence is written , which seems to refer back to the whole previous clause

它这么解释是说这种refer方式不对呢，还是说refer 的对象不对？

在紫皮的解释中，有这么一句(指原句中，即A中)：As the sentence is written , which seems to refer back to the whole previous clause

它这么解释是说这种refer方式不对呢，还是说refer 的对象不对？

作者: leogm 时间: 2008-4-30 10:12

此题首要错误是Baltic Sea sediments，容易让人以为是一种 sediments，与句意不符

其次考察“consistent with the
growth of industrial activity there ”修饰对象的理解，显然不会是Baltic Sea ，而应该是整个前句，所以用findings一词替代。

解释中用了seems to，正说明了这种用法不正确，因为which，在GMAT中，不能代替前面整个句子。

我也有几个语法问题，发帖了一直没人回复，请大家帮我解答一下，谢谢！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)