Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
我选B
A - 实为支持；B - 无关；C- 排除他因，支持；E- 支持
D的逻辑比较复杂，很难一眼看出来
D的意思是1930年的木工活比较好，这是为什么这些1930年前的hotel能继续使用的原因。如果这些hotel按照现在的木工质量，说不定早就不存在了（fall into demolish)
D的意思是1930年的木工活比较好，这是为什么这些1930年前的hotel能继续使用的原因。如果这些hotel按照现在的木工质量，说不定早就不存在了（fall into demolish)
这不是支持吗
说明以前的木工活比现在好啊
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |