ChaseDream

标题: GWD20中的19题 [打印本页]

作者: vianna    时间: 2008-4-23 22:18
标题: GWD20中的19题

    

Industrial accidents are
more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking
problems than when none do.  Since, even
after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely
than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying
to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for
a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.


    

 Which of the following,
if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?


    


            
A.     
Some companies place employees who are being treated for
drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid
sick leave.


    

B.      
Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by
employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.


    

C.     
Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they
sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem
and continue working for as long as possible.


    

D.     
People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to
stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including
drinking problems.


    

E.      
Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure
rather than by employee error.

答案是c,请问NN?



[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-23 22:18:51编辑过]

作者: vianna    时间: 2008-4-23 23:39
哪个好心人帮忙回答下吧


作者: anistonlucky    时间: 2008-4-23 23:48
我选B
作者: jj_banana    时间: 2008-4-24 01:03

我试试~比较弱

B 选项我认识它削弱了第一句话,是前提而不是结论。所以不能选B

C 这句话其实我觉得它主谓宾结构相当纠结。但可以意译成:如果那些WORKERS原本有DRINKING PROBLEM的不想LOSE JOB会选择CONCEAL,那么EMPLOYER在选择时会认为他们没有问题而录用。事实上他们有PROBLEM(会造成ACCIDENT)。这样的话,其实就是因果型削弱中的:无因(EMPLOYER认为他们没有过DRINKING PROBLEM TREATMENT)但有果(他们有PROBLEM会ACCIDENT)

写完好晕~期待意见!


作者: 天使追梦    时间: 2010-9-17 20:28
我试试~比较弱
B 选项我认识它削弱了第一句话,是前提而不是结论。所以不能选B
C 这句话其实我觉得它主谓宾结构相当纠结。但可以意译成:如果那些WORKERS原本有DRINKING PROBLEM的不想LOSE JOB会选择CONCEAL,那么EMPLOYER在选择时会认为他们没有问题而录用。事实上他们有PROBLEM(会造成ACCIDENT)。这样的话,其实就是因果型削弱中的:无因(EMPLOYER认为他们没有过DRINKING PROBLEM TREATMENT)但有果(他们有PROBLEM会ACCIDENT)
写完好晕~期待意见!
-- by 会员 jj_banana (2008/4/24 1:03:00)


清楚~thx~
作者: wangziwei    时间: 2010-9-17 21:49
个人认为此题的推理为:由于发生过意外的人更容易再次出现意外-----》他们不会被雇佣

问削弱
C选项:由于发生过意外的这些工人惧怕永远失去工作,所以他们会隐藏做自己曾经发生过意外的事实

由于他们隐藏,从而削弱“雇主禁止雇佣这类工人”这个结论,因为他们隐藏,导致雇主不知道他的雇员曾经有没有发生过类似意外,所以C削弱结论


B选项描述的事情对结论毫无作用,他们犯不犯错,和文章推理没关系,而且个人认为该选项有many,缺乏准确性,一般不会是正确答案,当然这只是个人意见
作者: 胖胖胖胖    时间: 2010-10-24 22:33
这个题在下有点看法,我觉得是比较差劲的一个题目
原因如下:
题目的逻辑是:曾经接受过酒类问题治疗的人更容易再犯毛病———> 所以要拒绝这些人
如果C是答案,那么就是说,管理者没法区分一个雇员是否曾经接受过酒类问题治疗,那么就没法拒绝这些人
问题在于,即使有些人会隐藏自己的经历也无关紧要,管理者拒绝那些没有隐藏经历的人还是可以减少安全事故的发生。况且,题目中也没有说设置一条禁令就一定能解决问题,而是说trying解决问题的应该bar这些人。

所以,我觉得该题出的不好,如果坚持要选择C,那么最后的问题应该是:下面哪项成立,将最大程度削弱管理者实行禁令后达到目的的可能性

请NN们批判俺的观点~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3