ChaseDream

标题: 最后总结时发现OG三个小问题,请教一下! [打印本页]

作者: along    时间: 2003-12-30 16:53
标题: 最后总结时发现OG三个小问题,请教一下!
1.og100题
  Wisconsin,……have begun to enforce statewide bans (E)that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.解释E为什么错:first of all, bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bas is illogical.
除去第一个问题不说,对于第二个:我可否认为是bans的同位语从句,那么为何ban后不能有否定词出现呢?

2.og107题
是否a or b做主语,谓语动词永远是复数?

3。对于分词,例如a of b done/doing,是否不能肯定这个后置定语修饰a或b,只能根据上下文理解来确定或a或b?

big bows!!
作者: cissy    时间: 2003-12-30 17:56


2.og107题
是否a or b做主语,谓语动词永远是复数?

a or b做主语,谓语动词的单复数由相邻的名词决定。
107. Downzoning, zoning that typically results in the reduction of housing density, allows for more open space in areas where little water or services exist.
A.    little water or services exist
B.    little water or services exists
C.    few services and little water exists
D.    there is little water or services available
E.    there are few services and little available water
类似于AB地情况中,由于services 是复数那么谓语动词应用复数exist。
而在与DE类似的there be 句型中,be 的单复数由紧接着的真正主语的单复数决定。
D中由little water决定要用is E中由于a b 用and 连接,故应用复数are

作者: 13917547    时间: 2003-12-30 20:37
bans 后面不能够用带否定词的同位语来解释其内容,而应该采用分词结构解释其内容;这是ETS的规定,记下来就是了;不要再去想同位语为什么不对。

a of b 分词的时候,分词只能够修饰B; A of B 定语从句的时候,定语从句可以修饰A, B

凡是OG讲的,都是对的!(无奈的道理)
作者: along    时间: 2003-12-30 22:11
可是我找到了一个反例
OG210题
filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by ……and extending for……
解释中讲得很清楚:A employs the paralle participial phrases spawned and extending to modify filigree

另外,我还有一个问题
OG141题
答案是C没问题:Unless the transplant involves identical twins who have the same genetic endowment
可是解释中有一句:Choice C, the  best answer, solve these problems by using a clause introduced by Unless to describe the exception to the rule and a nonrestrictive clause beginning with who to describe the characteristic attributed to all identical twins.
这怎么会是非限制定语从句呢?
作者: alfred4044    时间: 2003-12-31 05:50
"可是我找到了一个反例
OG210题
filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by ……and extending for……
解释中讲得很清楚:A employs the paralle participial phrases spawned and extending to modify filigree"
-------------------------along把OG烂熟于心,佩服!佩服!这里的“of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles”是filigree的修饰成分。所以是否应认为分词的修饰对象是a of b的中心词?

作者: 13917547    时间: 2003-12-31 18:49
回答along:

OG210题
filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by ……and extending for……
解释中讲得很清楚:A employs the paralle participial phrases spawned and extending to modify filigree"

注意,这里前面的部分根本没有划线,所以不能够作为反例。如果将未划线部分都考虑进去的话,OG自己就有很多矛盾的地方!

关于OG141的问题,我自己也没有把握,但觉得应该是with结构起限定作用,who引导的定语从句起修饰作用. 希望along能够从OG中找到反例!








欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3