Q2: GWD-4-14
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
给的答案是Ｄ，但我看了n边都觉得Ｄ选项是加强啊？
请教高人指点？
我选的是Ｂ．
其实，b是无关选项，酒店的容量与质量无关吧！
d是正确答案，其实的他的意思是：房子的质量越好越能长时间使用，而意思是作者看到了老的hotel是老hotel中质量好的，质量不好的老房子，作者是看不到的，因为都关门了，所以，这对作者的观点构成了驳斥
是不是这样的题目可以用排除法来做啊.确实其他选项都是无关选项.要是我也会选D. 考试短时间内不一定能想明白为什么D对,但是很清楚其他选项不对.
这样是否也是一种方法呢? 或者说此题并非让你选出正确的,而是排除错误呢?
请指教!
还是不太懂．
如果是排除无关选项，确实Ｄ胜出．
但是，Ｄ是说做工越好的楼，那么就越不可能被弃用或废弃掉．
而这个我觉得恰恰是在支持Guidebook writer的观点，而不是反驳．
如果Ｄ的less likely改成more likely，那毫不犹豫就是正确答案了．
请教．
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |