ChaseDream

标题: 一道费解的逻辑 [打印本页]

作者: 寂寞的自由    时间: 2003-12-29 05:49
标题: 一道费解的逻辑
15. After graduating form high school, people rarely multiply fractions or discuss ancient Rome, but theyare confronted daily with decisions relating to homeeconomics. Yet whereas mathematics and history arerequired courses in the high school curriculum, homeeconomics is only an elective, and few students choose to take it.Which of the following positions would be bestsupported by the considerations above?  BàC
(A) If mathematics and history were not requiredcourses, few students would choose to take them.
(B) Whereas home economics would be the mostuseful subject for people facing the decisionsthey must make in daily life, often mathematics and history can also help them face these decisions.
(C) If it is important to teach high school studentssubjects that relate to decisions that willconfront them in their daily lives, then homeeconomics should be made an important partof the high school curriculum.
(D) Mathematics, history, and other courses thatare not directly relevant to a person's dailylife should not be a required part of the highschool curriculum.
(E) Unless high schools put more emphasis onnonacademic subjects like home economics,people graduating from high school willnever feel comfortable about making thedecisions that will confront them in theirdaily lives.
正确答案是C,但为什么B不对呢?谢谢
作者: dansy    时间: 2003-12-29 10:22
个人理解: B更象是支持above considerations的,而不是 "best supported by above considerations".




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3