ChaseDream

标题: 再问一语法问题！！！ [打印本页]

作者: ambrosecelin 时间: 2008-4-6 14:01
标题: 再问一语法问题！！！

代词中有两条原则：

1。代词只能指代中心词，不能指代修饰语

2。代词指代就近原则

问：

1。这两条原则是否成立？

2。如果这两条原则成立的话，将其合并，则：

代词只能指代中心词，但如果就近的是修饰语（修饰语比中心词更接近代词），也不能指代修饰语

对吗？？

等待回答....

作者: courtney_fu 时间: 2008-4-6 15:24

对于1，似乎太绝对了吧？刚看了个帖子讨论代词指代修饰语的（OG10的90题）：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=53736

对于代词指代的原则，我也很晕的说~~~~~

作者: dingxiang 时间: 2008-4-6 18:15

不可能有什么绝对的原则吧, 更不能像做逻辑题目一样把两个原则联系起来,成立一个新原则.

关于代词指代, 我觉得OG本身并没有定论,做题最好不要首先用这个来排除

作者: seanrohan 时间: 2008-4-6 18:27
我觉得如果这两个结论可以成立，那么不是就不会产生指代混淆的问题了？
应该都不能成立吧？

作者: ambrosecelin 时间: 2008-4-6 18:53

刚刚看到一道PREP:

The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining that their diets were more varied than had been supposed.

(A) The application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel allows scientists to examine molars of prehuman ancestors and determining

(B) Through the application of a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the molars of prehuman ancestors were examined by scientists who determined

(C) When they applied a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists examined molars of prehuman ancestors, determining

(D) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, the molars of prehuman ancestors have been examined by scientists, who determined

(E) Applying a new method for analyzing the chemistry of tooth enamel, scientists have examined molars of prehuman ancestors and determined

key: E

解释说，从语法的角度上来讲B中的their应该是修饰scientists但从逻辑意思上来说却是应该修饰ancestors的

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)