ChaseDream

标题: OG11-50 B选项总结主语从句加被动往往错 [打印本页]

作者: judy44 时间: 2008-4-1 10:58
标题: OG11-50 B选项总结主语从句加被动往往错

50. That educators have not anticipated the impact
            of microcomputer technology can hardly be
            said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in
            Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E)The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact
of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

请问是否可以这样总结: 主语从句加被动往往错？

作者: 丫丫兔 时间: 2008-4-1 17:07

应该是吧。主动优先于被动原则

作者: usafighter 时间: 2008-4-1 22:09

根据OG解释，a的主要错误在于主语从句中又套了一个从句,打乱了正常的语序.而b中主要是can hardly be said to be at fault 很难在语法上完成这一从句.我们可以简化下看,就变成That...(这件事) be at fault.在正确句子里我们发现是educators(人)be at fault.所以在这里指事是不合语法的.

主动大于被动的前提是主动在语法上都没有错误,且动作发起者和接受者都是明确的.若主语从句中出现只能用无明确动作接受者的被动语态,并不能很肯定地说是错误的.

作者: judyenglish 时间: 2009-7-18 07:17
UP

作者: dephie 时间: 2010-7-23 00:51
up，还是对B选项的错误感到不适很明确，是说最重要的是表意错了吗？语法结构上看好像米有什么问题吧

作者: overmatch 时间: 2010-7-23 01:45
原句里面如果是that加从句然后是can hardly be said的话，那句子到这里就应该结束了。后面的什么that it is their fault就都是awkward sentence fragment了。换句话说，主语从句加被动语态后面很难加东西。。。比如修饰成分。

推而广之想到的一个问题是，如果主语和宾语都是从句是不是一定错？

OPEN TO DISCUSS!

作者: wangsiwei 时间: 2010-7-23 08:40
刚刚看了一个知识点，过来卖。
不能很笼统的说主动一定好过被动

在science, medical, and technical 方面，如果重点focus在被研究的对象上，而不是谁研究的，那么就应该用被动。总结来说，就是作者的中心是谁，谁是主语。列子－－
In this operation, new blood vessels are inserted to bypass blocked vessels.

说明：从迈哈炖现学现卖的。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)