scientists (with the goal of doing important new research) accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation,
若是colleagues--> 则一定是scientists with the goal of doing important new research
doing important new research是scientists colleague的必要条件,其逆否必然成立
scientists not with the goal of doing important new research--> not colleagues
所以文中结论no longer be regarded as a true colleague的前提是not with the goal of doing important new research,否则还是colleague
对于151，我明白为什么选D.
但是我觉得C也对。提干的意思：只有当科学家以做重要研究为目的他才会被其他研究科学家们看成是自己的同事。
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research。
c的意思是说不做重要实验也能成为著名popularizer。
所以成为著名popularizer可以不做重要实验，而不做重要实验就不会被其他研究科学家们看成是自己的同事。所以也可以说是搭桥吧。
不知道我的理解对不对？：）
盼解答，谢谢！：）
个人愚见：不做重要实验可以成为popularizer，但成为popularizer不一定没有做重要实验啊。
也就是：成为popularizer推不出没有做重要试验，所以搭桥不成立。
B呢。
B给出的是科学家因为妒忌而不承认那些出名的人是同事。OG的解释是给出了另一个“不承认是同事”的理由，但不是the reason implied in the passage，所以不是assumption.
从何得出the reason implied in the passage就不是B这个reason呢？是否题目有“most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague” 。
conclude表明了其原因（reason）是从文中条件得出，就是所谓的implied reason。题目的精髓是，reason实际上已经给出来了，要去找assumed。所以讲别的reason不管用。
这样理解对吗？
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they "envy"
Envy-an emotional term, should be eliminated from correct answer choice. normally ETS doesn't expect emotional terms to be the correct answer.
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without
having completed any important research
取非的话,就是scientist can become a famous popularize
with important research
讨论的是科学家能不能成为popularizer,而不是本文的论证关键点,他的goal/motivation是什么,所以没有搭桥
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |