ChaseDream

标题: every的用法 [打印本页]

作者: yuandong    时间: 2003-12-24 23:21
标题: every的用法
有谁知道every thirty two students做主语的话, 谓语动词是用单数还是复数呢?
作者: ca3ltoys    时间: 2003-12-25 03:15
should be plural.
作者: cissy    时间: 2003-12-25 16:16
up一下, 这是做og 89时,我也联想到的一个问题,没想到yuandong 就已经问了。有哪位大虾呢总结一下主谓一致中every不同的位置对谓语单复数的影响吗?
作者: dreadpower    时间: 2003-12-26 12:53
能帖个具体的句子吗??
作者: Snazzy    时间: 2003-12-26 14:04
every 32 students should be followed by plural

作者: cissy    时间: 2003-12-26 17:51
89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
A.    there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
B.    there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
C.    there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
D.    every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
E.    every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Ys" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.
作者: cissy    时间: 2003-12-26 18:08
比较
D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer
E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer
那么应用have 而不是has 了?
lzm语法总结说:当another,each one ,no one ,neither,the other,each(each of),either ,everything(-one,-body),anything ,something 作主语时,谓语用单数。我当时就将every划为这一类了。

而这里every 当作“每....”讲,主语的中心词还是thirty-two pupils ,所以谓语动词要用复数。
作者: yuandong    时间: 2003-12-26 20:54
i think cissy mm is right
作者: dreadpower    时间: 2003-12-27 00:27
好解释!!!!又学会了一个用法!!!


作者: Snazzy    时间: 2003-12-27 14:24
nice
作者: 欧阳可情    时间: 2003-12-27 16:37
UP
作者: qsrlw    时间: 2004-12-9 05:56

four times as many as there were

I think this is the test point by ETS,not every......   in this question.  So when you look at "four times as many than" in Q, as..... than. should be replaced in choinces.   Anyway, what Cissy concluded is really helpful. Thank you


作者: p200002    时间: 2004-12-9 06:04
ETS解释得已经非常清楚了,ONE OF EVERY THIRTY-TWO Ys指的是一种比率,当然答案在ABC中选,ONE当然是单数嘍.
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-9 6:07:49编辑过]

作者: joe11    时间: 2005-2-25 12:37

再讨论 every 用法  [Longman]

[always followed by a singular countable noun]
1
used to refer to all the people or things in a particular group or all the parts of something
We looked carefully at every car that drove past.

Every child will receive a certificate at the end of the course.

I enjoyed every minute of the film.I listened carefully to every word he said.

every single (=used to emphasize that you mean 'all')

He seems to know every single person in the school.

every last drop/bit/scrap etc (=all of something, including even the smallest amount of it)

They made us pick up every last scrap of paper.

如果Longman 字典是对的,那么 every animal species 是不是有问题呢?

另有 every 32 pupils (OG89).

请教呀。


作者: greatvampire    时间: 2005-2-25 13:34
up
作者: joe11    时间: 2005-2-25 21:39

American Heritage Book of English Usage     http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/027.html





§ 27. every










Every is representative of a large class of English words and expressions that are singular in form but felt to be plural in sense. The class includes, for example, noun phrases introduced by every, any, and certain uses of some. These expressions invariably take a singular verb; we say Every car has (not have) been tested. Anyone is (not are) liable to fall ill. But when a sentence contains a pronoun that refers to a previous noun phrase introduced by every, grammar and sense pull in different directions. The grammar of these expressions requires a singular pronoun, as in Every car must have its brakes tested, but the meaning often leads people to use the plural pronoun, as in Every car must have their brakes tested. The use of plural pronouns in such cases is common in speech, but it is still widely regarded as incorrect in writing.   1
  The effort to adhere to the grammatical rule causes complications, however. The first is grammatical. When a pronoun refers to a phrase containing every or any that falls within a different independent clause, the pronoun cannot be singular. Thus it is simply not English to say Every man left; he took his raincoat with him. Nor can you say No one could be seen, could he? If you are unwilling to use plural forms in these examples, you must find another way of expressing your meaning, either by rephrasing the sentence so as to get the pronoun into the same clause (as in Every man left, taking his raincoat with him) or by substituting another word for every or any (as in All the men left; they took their raincoats with them).   2
  The second complication is political. When a phrase introduced by every or any refers to a group containing both men and women, what pronoun should you use? Consider the example Every person in this office must keep track of his (her? his or her? their?) own expenses. This matter is discussed at he under Gender.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-25 21:39:58编辑过]

作者: colacat    时间: 2005-2-25 22:08

再问 choice C there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were

为什么是were,而不是was



作者: chelin_wu1220    时间: 2005-2-27 16:11

four times as many as there were 的主语是computer,所以要用were

因为如果four times 是指every thirty-two students or the ratio(one computer for every thirty-two students的话

都是在逻辑上说不通的


作者: benjaminshufe    时间: 2005-3-25 16:06
本来正在困惑中, 现在明白了!谢谢!
作者: Dennies    时间: 2005-4-1 11:41

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
A. there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
B. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
C. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

本题语法总结如下:

now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils是比率的正确表示方法,four times as many as 是修饰前面整个比率的,THERE WERE后省略了microcomputer for pupils

用3-2的做法,D.Eevery thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer不是表示比率,four times as many as修饰thirty-two pupils 在逻辑上说不过.

every thirty-two pupils 还是一个复数概念,应用HAVE



作者: ghostlhx    时间: 2005-6-11 07:04

now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils是比率的正确表示方法,four times as many as 是修饰前面整个比率的,THERE WERE后省略了microcomputers for pupils


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-11 7:05:25编辑过]

作者: lukewang1983    时间: 2005-8-11 11:06
以下是引用chelin_wu1220在2005-2-27 16:11:00的发言:

four times as many as there were 的主语是computer,所以要用were


因为如果four times 是指every thirty-two students or the ratio(one computer for every thirty-two students的话


都是在逻辑上说不通的



wow, strong support your explaination!!! Its much better than og's!


And Iwanna say something about "every", in og89, can we just think every 32 students as a GROUP??? then we can use “单数"


作者: howardwang    时间: 2005-8-11 11:36

every thirty-two pupils做主语时,谓语应该用复数。


因为 every在此是形容词,中心词是pupils。即使表示的是个小组的概念,也是指小组整体。这类似于people.


表示个体感念是,every 更强调总体中的个体,它的“总合”意义很重;


作者: juliet01192000    时间: 2005-10-5 16:04

我认为“four times as many as there were”是修饰学生与电脑的比率的(one microcomputer for every 32 students).这在逻辑上是讲的通的。因为本句比较的就是这个比率在时间先后上的不同,从而表明有更多的学生拥有了电脑。如果这个短语仅仅修饰电脑的话,没有什么意义,因为现在电脑的数量是原来的4倍,但是现在学生的人数也有可能增加,算下来,现在的比率可能还比原来的低呢!!!


看到有人说there were后省略了computers for students又觉得有道理, 我想应该把它理解为是电脑和学生比率的另一种表示方法(以前也是很多电脑对很多学生,只不过学生数量很多:))。


向大家求证理解是否正确!!!谢谢!!!


作者: puppytiger    时间: 2005-11-9 19:56
thanks
作者: IndianaJones    时间: 2005-12-25 04:22

terrific


作者: carlito    时间: 2006-1-19 12:25
NICE!!
作者: swich36    时间: 2006-3-21 00:52

谢谢


作者: mywaymydream    时间: 2006-4-14 11:56

我又知道了一个用法,这正是这几天我在考虑的.


作者: demon_hunter    时间: 2006-4-28 14:18
以下是引用joe11在2005-2-25 21:39:00的发言:

American Heritage Book of English Usage     http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/027.html





§ 27. every










Every is representative of a large class of English words and expressions that are singular in form but felt to be plural in sense. The class includes, for example, noun phrases introduced by every, any, and certain uses of some. These expressions invariably take a singular verb; we say Every car has (not have) been tested. Anyone is (not are) liable to fall ill. But when a sentence contains a pronoun that refers to a previous noun phrase introduced by every, grammar and sense pull in different directions. The grammar of these expressions requires a singular pronoun, as in Every car must have its brakes tested, but the meaning often leads people to use the plural pronoun, as in Every car must have their brakes tested. The use of plural pronouns in such cases is common in speech, but it is still widely regarded as incorrect in writing.   1
  The effort to adhere to the grammatical rule causes complications, however. The first is grammatical. When a pronoun refers to a phrase containing every or any that falls within a different independent clause, the pronoun cannot be singular. Thus it is simply not English to say Every man left; he took his raincoat with him. Nor can you say No one could be seen, could he? If you are unwilling to use plural forms in these examples, you must find another way of expressing your meaning, either by rephrasing the sentence so as to get the pronoun into the same clause (as in Every man left, taking his raincoat with him) or by substituting another word for every or any (as in All the men left; they took their raincoats with them).   2
  The second complication is political. When a phrase introduced by every or any refers to a group containing both men and women, what pronoun should you use? Consider the example Every person in this office must keep track of his (her? his or her? their?) own expenses. This matter is discussed at he under Gender.



According to this explanation, "every thirty-two students " should be followed by plural verb, isn't it?


confusing...


Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-28 14:18:45编辑过]

作者: GMAT06    时间: 2006-5-29 13:12

The explaination from American heritage book is interesting, but I think it limited the word"every" here as "all" not "every + quantities+ noun" which is a expresstion of ratio, so they have different meanings in these two sentenses.

Try to feel this: every 32 students VS every students ??

Just my opinions....let's try our best!!


作者: yilan    时间: 2006-7-20 02:16
还是很confuse阿
作者: tony_cn    时间: 2006-8-9 00:11

我觉得这个时候every是作adj。 修饰students。  所以应该用复数。

而each ,either等单词可以作pron.    例如: each of students 时 这个时候each本身就是主语  所以用singular


作者: mangzi99    时间: 2006-8-28 11:05

作者: fengyun1    时间: 2006-9-5 10:05

找阿找,金山词霸的解释蛮好的,贴给大家:

Every is representative of a large class of English words and expressions that are singular in form but felt to be plural in sense. The class includes, for example, noun phrases introduced by  every, any, and certain uses of  some. These expressions invariably take a singular verb; we say   Every car has (not  have)  been tested. Anyone is (not  are)  liable to fall ill. But when a sentence contains a pronoun whose antecedent is introduced by  every, grammar and sense pull in different directions. The grammar of these expressions requires a singular pronoun, as in   Every car must have its brakes tested, but people persist in using the plural pronoun, as in   Every car must have their brakes tested. Although the latter pattern is common in the speech of all groups, it is still widely regarded as grammatically incorrect in writing.


作者: cx1205    时间: 2006-9-23 08:09
your means is when i met every +number +nouns ,useing plural,and when we met every +nouns ,using singular?? are you sure??
作者: smilinggirl1    时间: 2006-10-25 14:55

想问一下,问什么four times as many as there were,为什么不是there was,应该是单数吧


作者: fantasy06    时间: 2006-10-26 03:49

up


作者: ynian    时间: 2006-10-26 05:47
新东方石林讲座:

在GMAT中不考单复数的整体概念,因为容易造成混淆,所以名词加s就是复数概念,不加就是单数概念。

在四六级,高考中every的概念在GMAT中用不到。



作者: fantasy06    时间: 2006-10-30 00:34
Thanks!
作者: tiantian8273    时间: 2006-11-5 10:02

Just share some guidelines for the usage of 'each' & 'every' that I extracted from Manhattan GMAT Verbel Strategy Guide:

''Each'' and ''every'' Signular Sensations

You  just learned that when each or every  is the subject of a sentence, it requires a sigular verb form. The same is true for any subject preceded by the word each or every, For Instance:

1.Every dog HAS paws.

2.Every dog and Cat HAS paws.

3.Each of these shirts IS pretty.

One may mistake the subject of the second and third sentences to be plural. However, because the subject is preceded by each or every,it is considered signuar and therefore requires a singular verb form. Note, however,that when each or every follows a subject, it has no bearing on the verb form. For example:

They each ARE great tennis play.

Here, the plural subject they requires the verb form ARE

So from my understanding,for the answers D & E in OG-89,if we only judge in terms of 'subject-verb agreement' ,the 'has' in E is not gramatically incorrect,yet both answers are flawed for the sentence as a whole because they either fail to use a parallel structure or make comparisons between wrong objects. Both errors are corrected in the best answer C.

In regards to the 'there were' or 'there was' issue, I think the correct choice is dertimined by the actual subject of the sentence.So here computers, rather than the pecentage of computers, is the actual subject of the sentence, and it's illogical to state that 'there was **%...'in the GMAT test because in GMAT 'there be' is normally not used for abstract concepts but for concrete ones. The reason why computers here
        
is in plural form is , from my opinion, that the sentence is comparing all the computers owned by students now with those four years ago. 

As for the 'percent' issue discussed in the previous posts, I agree that 'every + Number +Noun'implies certain meanting of percentage,yet to express the same meaning one can use various grammatical structures, for example:

Every 4 students in a class of 16 students HAS three computers/a computer.

one-fourth of the students in a class of 16 students HAVE computers.

Among all the 16 students in the class, 4 (students) of them HAVE computers.

More or less, each of the above three sentences conveys sutle meaning of 'percentage' while the gramatical expressions are different.The key point is what is the real,or say the central subject of each sentence(see words marked in red). Ithink the confusion is generated mainly from the the way how we commonly translate english sentences into chinese ones,a process in which one frequently forcuses more on translating the meaning while neglecting some underlined grammatical elements in the original senttence.


作者: sunnielight    时间: 2007-4-4 13:14
真理不是越辩越明吗?我怎么更晕了
作者: jessica1117    时间: 2007-4-6 18:11
以下是引用ghostlhx在2005-6-11 7:04:00的发言:

now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils是比率的正确表示方法,four times as many as 是修饰前面整个比率的,THERE WERE后省略了microcomputers for pupils


既然 这句话的前半部分已经是“one microcomputer", 后面为什么不可以是there was one microcomputer fur pupils?

请指教:)


作者: lj30633    时间: 2007-7-2 17:07
以下是引用tiantian8273在2006-11-5 10:02:00的发言:

Ithink the confusion is generated mainly from the the way how we commonly translate english sentences into chinese ones,a process in which one frequently forcuses more on translating the meaning while neglecting some underlined grammatical elements in the original senttence.

同意!


作者: cristina310    时间: 2007-8-9 21:29

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
A. there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
B. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
C. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Can not understand what you discussed. I think that the best answer should be

A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there was four years ago.

按照句子对仗来说,前后的单复数应该一样,不可能前面单后后面双,或者前面双而后面单啊。而且there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils这个从句中主要指的是one microcomputer,况且every thirty-two pupils应该作为一个整体而不是分开的32个学生,所以为啥要用复数呢?同理,four times as many than there were four years ago 省略的是 one microcomputer for every XX pupils,所以也该用单数并且是过去式,我是这么理解的。觉得以上全错,呵呵。


作者: yetemwok    时间: 2007-9-5 03:36

多谢总结. 每次见到这些鬼东西我都生气.

不过,在阅读中,我从来没有见过EVERY 32 PEOPLE HAVE A COMPUTER这样的书面表达. 是否见到EVERY + PLURAL NOUN就选择PLURAL VERB?

多谢


作者: qhgary    时间: 2007-9-5 18:09
以下是引用cristina310在2007-8-9 21:29:00的发言:

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
A. there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
B. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
C. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Can not understand what you discussed. I think that the best answer should be

A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there was four years ago.

按照句子对仗来说,前后的单复数应该一样,不可能前面单后后面双,或者前面双而后面单啊。而且there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils这个从句中主要指的是one microcomputer,况且every thirty-two pupils应该作为一个整体而不是分开的32个学生,所以为啥要用复数呢?同理,four times as many than there were four years ago 省略的是 one microcomputer for every XX pupils,所以也该用单数并且是过去式,我是这么理解的。觉得以上全错,呵呵。

我也有此一文的,为什么后面要用were?应该是was才对啊。哪位大侠帮忙解释一下。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-5 18:10:23编辑过]

作者: jiangyz    时间: 2007-9-26 23:19
以下是引用cissy在2003-12-26 17:51:00的发言:
89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
A. there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
B. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
C. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Ys" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

to this question, I think that the structure "four times ......" is the 同位语,so both D and E are inaccuracy.

to A and B, the structure as many than is false, so the best answer is C. 


作者: jiangyz    时间: 2007-9-26 23:25

我认为four times as many than there were four years ago 省略的是等同于 1/4 microcomputer for every 32 pupils这样的结构。1/4是否用复数?


作者: renpinwudi    时间: 2007-11-23 22:52

Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Ys" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

从cissy的例子开始就看疯了…… 不知道是不是自己搞错了 根本就在讨论一个无关样本! there is one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils: is 对应的是one computer, 跟后面的every没关系   仅从D E 2个错误选项里 有什么好总结的 根本没有代表性 就算D E 很明显OG的说法是EVERY xxx  HAS(OR HAVE)这个结构与后面不对应 根本没有解释have has的问题

LZM那个说法是错的  那些词只是在“正常用法下”接单数  EVERY 32 PUPILS本身是个特殊情况 如果非要说是接单数 我只能理解我是作为一个整体 一点点类似于every cup and folk has, 或者是因为习惯 every man and women has.  但我google了一下 英语论坛也没讨论清楚http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbSingularPluralForm/jmzl/Post.htm     没时间继续google 希望谁能搜到个真正权威的说法来解释every 32 pupils has or have的问题


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-23 23:09:58编辑过]

作者: freshopenair    时间: 2008-9-1 21:13
有没有一个权威的答案啊。好晕啊。
作者: tianyi_2003    时间: 2008-9-2 17:37

遵循主语 谓语要一致的原理

every 32 students,主语是32 students,和 every 无关,用复数

注意each of 32 students,这个主语的中心词是each必须用单数

至于there be 的单复数用法,以近为准,比如, there is A and B, A是单数所以就用is,和B无关,至于There is A prep B, 那当然更不用管B了


作者: yichousun    时间: 2008-9-6 00:54
我和楼上的想法一样!
作者: heritta    时间: 2008-9-8 17:35

先做个记号, 我完全没看懂...... 泪

there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were

there were 后面省略掉的是什么啊?

如果是 there were 1/4 microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils four years ago 为什么要用 were 呢?


作者: jillylm    时间: 2008-9-8 18:58
这道题感觉考点不是has/have,因为陈述的是一种比例关系,have/has指的是实际所属关系,这里并不是说,每32个学生拥有一台电脑,而是强调每32个学生配备一台电脑使用,所以考点是as many as和there be A+prep phrase, there be 用单复数是根据就近原则的。D和E没什么好讨论,逻辑意义上不通。
作者: forestsky    时间: 2008-10-1 06:07
the use of less and fewer:

less is used for mass nouns (uncountable), fewer is used for count nouns.
little > less > least; few > fewer > fewest
since amount, time, distance, money, etc. are measureable, not countable, less should be used instead of fewer. For example, 2 hours or less.

less of nouns (less here refers to amount), equivalent to less amout of nouns. fewer nouns, there is no need and no place for fewer of nouns, since fewer can directly link to nouns.

作者: elle08    时间: 2008-10-16 23:00

我觉得解这道题没这么复杂,首先four times as many as是固定搭配,因此ABD很快被排除,然后E的比较对象是错的,也被排除,只剩下C必选了。

我记得Gemj说过,不要太过抠一个语法点,没有太大的意义。


作者: 妞妞的牛牛    时间: 2008-10-30 00:16
以下是引用renpinwudi在2007-11-23 22:52:00的发言:

Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Ys" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

从cissy的例子开始就看疯了…… 不知道是不是自己搞错了 根本就在讨论一个无关样本! there is one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils: is 对应的是one computer, 跟后面的every没关系   仅从D E 2个错误选项里 有什么好总结的 根本没有代表性 就算D E 很明显OG的说法是EVERY xxx  HAS(OR HAVE)这个结构与后面不对应 根本没有解释have has的问题

LZM那个说法是错的  那些词只是在“正常用法下”接单数  EVERY 32 PUPILS本身是个特殊情况 如果非要说是接单数 我只能理解我是作为一个整体 一点点类似于every cup and folk has, 或者是因为习惯 every man and women has.  但我google了一下 英语论坛也没讨论清楚http://www.englishforums.com/English/VerbSingularPluralForm/jmzl/Post.htm     没时间继续google 希望谁能搜到个真正权威的说法来解释every 32 pupils has or have的问题


我同意renpinwudi的观点,从OG的解释来看,这道题压根就没考every用单数还是复数,也没说every 32 pupils改变了one X for...是错的,只是说DE这么用,是后面的four times as many as指pupils了,错误在这里,而不在have/has


作者: executive    时间: 2009-2-25 03:10

agree with 妞妞的牛牛, the key points of this question are

1) as many as --- the second ‘as'不可少

2) there were 不可少

Every 单复数不是考点,看来ETS没打算在'Every'上做文章,因为没有用法上的统一共识


作者: xxxyyyxxx    时间: 2009-4-26 10:48
Gooooood
作者: ryanyong    时间: 2009-5-12 23:14
EVERY后来加单数,错不了
 加复数,则很可能错

权衡吧

作者: 青风逢林    时间: 2009-5-20 01:25

觉得还是解决不了there were

就当做 1/4要用复数好了。。。


作者: lijiahui0422    时间: 2009-7-2 09:21
很受用
作者: feifeizoe    时间: 2009-7-5 18:12

OG 89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.

A. there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

B. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

C. there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were

D. every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were

E. every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

看这道题目的时候我自己选择的是C,但是我有一个疑虑:就是four times as many than there were
            
为什么要用there were,而不是there was,与前面的there is now 不对称。

C,但是我有一个疑虑:就是four times as many than there were
    
为什么要用there were,而不是there was,与前面的there is now 不对称。

看了大家的分析后,总结如下:

1. 从句子的整体上看,句子结构是:

there is XXX, four times as many as there were.

否则句子的结构就不对称了。

因此,直接可以排除ABDE了。

 

2. 如果仔细考虑句尾的there were,可以按照句意理解’four times as many as’实际上是一个数量的比较

因此这里句尾其实是there were computers four years ago. 而不是牵强的要和前面的there is 对称

 

3. 如果不考虑句子结构对于every 32 students,到底应该是用以下哪个用法:

Every 32 students have a computer.

Every 32 students has a computer.

 

从一般的语法概念上:

Every+ singular noun/plural noun + v (singular form).

 

但是这个句式是一般指每个XXXXX。不管是单数还是复数,表示的是一个单个的概念来表现整体的意思。引用例子:

1.Every dog HAS paws.

2.Every dog and Cat HAS paws.

3.Each of these shirts IS pretty.

 

这里的句子中都是表示个体的狗,猫和狗,衬衣。

 

OG89题中,句意是表示每32个人拥有一台电脑。强调的是32个人,而不是32个人的个体,因此我觉得应该使用复数

Every 32 students have a computer.


作者: lionkingqh    时间: 2009-11-18 15:17
很好的用法,谢谢
作者: ggghost    时间: 2010-1-3 18:48
C与E都不理想,大家先撇开OA来说,there were 没有道理,应该是there was,大家可以查找其他there be相关的比较句(GMAT所有官方题库)。
E中four times as many as修饰的应该是one computer,因为many是形容词,所以不是修饰主补就是宾补,这里肯定是就近修饰的,大家也可以找相关的句子(GMAT所有官方题库)来驳斥我。我觉得这道题只是ETS出疵了。
作者: luluAUS    时间: 2010-2-9 12:07
越看越晕啊啊啊啊。。。。没有必要这么仔细的抠吧我觉得。。。。基本语法底子打好,GMAT的一些东西了解鸟,熟悉它的思路就好了吧。。。。。鄙人觉得这么死抠语法点应该不是GMAT的用意所在吧。。。还是觉得如果能扩大阅读量增强语感比较适合我这种懒人。。。。仰望NN中。。。太强大了。。。我是个懒人。。。。
作者: mollymolly    时间: 2010-4-4 23:18
弱弱的问  为什么  E 逻辑不对
作者: Ykong    时间: 2010-8-14 09:08
不懂的就别瞎讲,误导别人,浪费时间。
作者: nicolelexi    时间: 2010-9-21 00:04

作者: linfeng87    时间: 2010-12-19 16:24
正如 manhattan gmat中所说,在gmat中,there be 后面一般跟的是具体概念,而非抽象概念
在这里,比率是抽象概念,而电脑是具体概念,
所以,在题目中there be 后面跟 电脑比较好
因此,这里用 there were ,而不是 there was
作者: mmbma    时间: 2011-1-14 00:59
其实这道题最重要的不是什么every 32要不要在单复数上面纠结。首先as many as这个习惯用法排除a,b,d, 。C肯定比E好是因为E说 32 people now have one computer, 4 times as many as before. 整个句子来看,说的是现在教育水平提高了,学生有更多的电脑了。而这个选项可以被理解为现在更多的学生(32个)共用1台电脑(比原来更差,原来是每8人一台)。这个逻辑明显错误,所以选C
作者: lxke2000    时间: 2011-1-23 11:38
我的一点总结:


- four times as many as 修饰谁


谁都可以修饰,取决于four times as many as 后面比较的对象,它可以指代# of microcomputers,也可以指代 # of pupils. 


A / B / C中表达清晰,there are 1 microcomputer + 介词短语作后置定语 + four times as many as + there be, 显然比较的是 # of microcomputers


(这里仍然不清楚的是 既然知道4年前是每32个人分享0.25台机器,为什么这里不用"Was",而是 "were"呢? - there is now one microcomputer for every 32 pupils, four times as many as there were 4 years ago. 可不可以把电脑数理解成一个不确定的概念?既可以是4年前,每32个人1/4台电脑,也可以是每256个人2台电脑...)


但是在D / E中,32个学生 (主语) + 谓语 + 宾语 (1台计算机), four times as many as, 其后缺少比较对象,语义不清,既可以比较学生数,也可以比较计算机数,两者恰恰是两个意思,所以意义不清




- as many as 固定用法


这个大家都知道,固定用法


- every 32 pupils 接动词的单复数


我同意这里表复数的概念,可以总结为:在OG89题中,句意是表示每32个人拥有一台电脑。强调的是32个人,而不是32个人的个体,因此我觉得应该使用复数。


Every / Each + N. (Singular / Plural) + V (singular)
Every / Each + of + + N. (Singular / Plural) + V (singular)
Every / Each + 大于1的数目 + N (Plural) + V (Plural)


- 调整句子结构使表达清晰 (A B C) VS. (D E)


同第一点,D/E有歧义
作者: xiqi    时间: 2011-3-17 23:34
??
作者: genesis123    时间: 2011-3-20 21:33
讲的很仔细嘛
作者: 白骨晶    时间: 2011-10-11 11:51
THANKS
作者: ericaikg    时间: 2012-8-29 13:26
又长知识了
作者: yaoyiqing16    时间: 2013-1-11 10:20
好贴 。
作者: yuyouding    时间: 2013-6-11 23:54
henhao..........
作者: panpan773    时间: 2014-9-4 12:06
every thirty two pupils should be plural
作者: 紫红葡萄    时间: 2016-12-2 11:25
41楼 tiantian8273 同学已经解释得很清楚了,曼哈顿笔记已经说得非常清晰关于every,each单复数问题了。
作者: 托比昂    时间: 2017-2-18 10:46
Snazzy 发表于 2003-12-27 14:24
nice



作者: 托比昂    时间: 2017-2-18 10:47
感谢分享!               
作者: JohnResse    时间: 2021-3-11 17:18
Mark一下!               
作者: inoooooo    时间: 2023-12-17 12:45
想问一下那么there were应该怎么理解呢?这个为什么用were不用was?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3