1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.
A. occurring when a child
B. occurring when children
C. that occurred when a child
D. that occurred when they were children
E. that has occurred as each was a child
Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.
看了看以前的帖子，还是有几个问题没弄明白，麻烦大家帮看一下：
1. thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child 这句话应该怎么理解？
2. 解释说选项A中有structure and logic 两方面错误
我的理解structure的错误是分词+when 引导的时间状从有误；logic的错误是分词表示多次重复性行为，而devoice不是多次重复性行为。不知理解是否正确？
3. 有帖子说occurring when a child 是省略，还原后是occurring when (divorce is) a child，这是logic错误；而白勇书上说状从的省略是连接词when+adj短语/ing分词短语/ed分词短语短语（逻辑主语为句子主语），连接词+介短/名词短语 是错误形式，既然是错误形式，又怎么能还原成occurring when (divorce is) a child？？白勇说的是否正确？？
麻烦大家给看一下，先谢谢大家！
建议把以前的帖子看完
看了看以前的帖子，还是有几个问题没弄明白，麻烦大家帮看一下：
1. thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child 这句话应该怎么理解？
因为when a child是时间状语从句，所以这个从句的主语应该和前面的一样。
前面的是什么occurring呢？是divorce,所以这个状语从句的主语也变成了divorce，也就是when divorce was a child。
再举个例子，比较以下两句话的差异。
I was dancing when reading.
I was dancing when she was reading.
由此可以说明，当时间状语从句的主语和主句的主语不同时，一定要明确的标明。
2. 解释说选项A中有structure and logic 两方面错误
我的理解structure的错误是分词+when 引导的时间状从有误；logic的错误是分词表示多次重复性行为，而devoice不是多次重复性行为。不知理解是否正确？
when在这里引导的名词的错误是结构性的，前后时态不一致，前面是experience，后面是过去式。所以不能省略为简单的when ()a
child.逻辑性错误是divorce occurring when a child。是孩子的时候就经历了离婚，并且还是一直持续着
3. 有帖子说occurring when a child 是省略，还原后是occurring when (divorce is) a child，这是logic错误；而白勇书上说状从的省略是连接词when+adj短语/ing分词短语/ed分词短语短语（逻辑主语为句子主语），连接词+介短/名词短语 是错误形式，既然是错误形式，又怎么能还原成occurring when (divorce is) a child？？白勇说的是否正确？？
是省略，但因为前后时态不一致，在这里是不可以省略的。
When可以只接名词,前提是必须和主句一致
When still a boy of six, Bob was sent away from home. (章振邦 p1155). 所以白勇这一点过于绝对了
先谢谢tianshangke
I was dancing when I was reading.
I was dancing when she was reading.
还有点疑惑，when状从省略是在从句的主谓语与主句一致时才可以省略，可这里谓语没有be,为什么还原成divorce was a child
完全糊涂了
when修饰occurring, occurring修饰divorce,省略的，按照OG来说，只能是divorce了。
when 和as不能互换，在哪里还可找到更加详细的解释？想仔细看看
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |