标题: 关于which的用法 [打印本页] 作者: yuandong 时间: 2003-12-22 21:16 标题: 关于which的用法 我记得LZM的书中公理有说:which决不可以前面的整个句子.这种说法应该在official guide中也有体现. 大家看看下一题如何解答 5 (There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.) a)There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing. b)There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished. c)There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing. d)Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished. e)Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished. C中的which的用法好像有违背这个公理,大家讨论一下作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-12-22 22:16
是啊，有道理啊，yuandong好细心！！！
请教牛人！！！！！作者: msryiyg2 时间: 2003-12-22 23:17
我想这题在A,C选项中只能看逻辑关系，试把There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing补全就是There are no legal limits, as there are no legal limits for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing,这样一看马上觉得逻辑非常怪，再加上their是复数，所以可以排除A。作者: yuandong 时间: 2003-12-23 09:53
我觉得现在LZM的这个公理是不是应该不能被称为公理了,至少说不能够用这个"假说"(呵呵)来排除答案.作者: fair_sword 时间: 2003-12-23 10:14
至于which是否能指代一句话，我保留意见，但是其他选项中错误很明显。A.B中them,their无指代，de中比较对象无比较性，只有c