ChaseDream

标题: 885 section2-19 [打印本页]

作者: weideng 时间: 2008-2-17 22:25
标题: 885 section2-19

19. Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.

(A) compensating state governments for damage to

(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of

(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of

(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

（A）正确,想问一下C为什么不对.

million thanks

作者: weideng 时间: 2008-2-17 22:25

answer is A,why not C?

thanks

作者: atc 时间: 2008-2-18 00:13
compensating比giving compensation简洁，for damage to与for injury to 平行

作者: heslaw 时间: 2008-2-18 00:18

C 有歧义

giving state governments compensation for damaging

可以理解为因为他们破坏了自己的资源，所以给他们补偿

B,E有这种歧义

D of 不对，应该是跟to

作者: weideng 时间: 2008-2-18 11:15

i got it,

million thanks

作者: susanxu9 时间: 2008-7-24 18:31

以下是引用atc在2008-2-18 0:13:00的发言：
compensating比giving compensation简洁，for damage to与for injury to 平行

但是我在longman online上没有查到有permit doing的用法，只有permit sb to do.

有没有permit doing的表达法呢？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)