ChaseDream

标题: 看了关于OG229以前的讨论,提一个没讨论过的问题 [打印本页]

作者: hans_jin    时间: 2008-1-26 13:03
标题: 看了关于OG229以前的讨论,提一个没讨论过的问题

229. The colorization of black-and-white films by
                        computers is defended by those who own the film rights, for the process can mean increased revenues for them; many others in the film industry, however, contend that the technique degrades major works of art, which they liken to putting
                            lipstick on a Greek statue.

(A)  which they liken to putting lipstick on a Greek statue

(B)  which they liken to a Greek statue with lipstick put on it

(C)  which they liken to lipstick put on a Greek statue

(D)  likening it to a Greek statue with lipstick put on it

(E)  likening it to putting lipstick on a Greek statue

我有个疑问,似乎之前没人提出.就是A,B,C中的WHICH是否能跳跃修饰the technique? 这样的话,A 选项就可以改写为they( many others) liken which (the technique) to putting lipstick on a greek statue. 于是A选项就对了。

OPEN TO DISCUSS 


作者: vely301    时间: 2008-1-26 13:48

不好意思 差話一下 怎麼可以用they liken阿?

liken不是PP嗎?

PP的話不可以單用吧~"~

應該要分have或had這些一起用不是嗎?

還是我太笨了>"<

請NN幫幫忙吧 謝謝^^


作者: hans_jin    时间: 2008-1-26 14:42

这里的liken本身就是个vt,把~比作。所以没问题。

金山词霸的解释是:liken sth. to把某事物比作。


作者: hans_jin    时间: 2008-2-3 22:46

自问自答,现在知道了非限制性定语从句which不能跳跃修饰。that可以。


作者: johnyin    时间: 2008-2-4 11:57

that恐怕也不可以吧……

他们liken的是degrade the major works of arts 这种行为,which不能修饰一个句子;而且they指代不明,所以a怎么都不对。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-2-4 11:57:55编辑过]





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3