ChaseDream

标题: OG 20,思路偏差,求救求救... [打印本页]

作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-1-24 15:18
标题: OG 20,思路偏差,求救求救...

 The number of people diagnosed as having a certain intestinal disease has dropped significantly in a rural county this year, as compared to last year. Health officials attibute this decrease entirely to improved sanitary conditions at water-treatment plants, which made for cleaner water this year and thus reduced the incidence of the disease.

 

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the health officials’ explanation for the lower incidence of the disease?

B. Bottled spring water has not been consumed in significantly different quantities by people diagnosed as having the intestinal disease, as compared to people who did not contract the disease.

我想请教一下这个选项为什么错,因为觉得好像自己思路有点偏差

B说,染病的人和不染病的人喝水的数量几乎没差别,那是不是可以说不是因为水的问题导致的疾病下降,那样不是也同样削弱了么?


作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-1-24 22:38
自己顶一下,斑竹能不能帮个忙??急~~~
作者: langbaobao1031    时间: 2008-1-24 22:45
Bottled spring water 意思好像是矿泉水吧?矿泉水当然和城市的水污染没关系了。此选项应该算无关。
作者: neo1001    时间: 2008-1-24 22:59
B说得是瓶装矿泉水。。。

原题里说的普通饮用水。。。(water treatment plant)

作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-1-25 10:45

晕~我明白了。。。。阴沟里帆船了。。。。谢谢


作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-1-25 10:46
再问一句,那如果是一样的水呢?B的选项改为普通饮用水的话,是不是就削弱了????
作者: dennyhuang    时间: 2008-5-4 00:19

本人觉得是削弱了.


作者: lois_lvy    时间: 2008-9-1 23:32

(A)          Many new water-treatment plants have been built in the last five years in the rural county.

请问A为什么就是不对呢

明显就是削弱阿,五年来说都装了water treatment plants,证明根本不是sanitation的contribution阿

请大牛们给我一点思路,谢谢


作者: jennylei    时间: 2008-9-3 22:27
以下是引用lois_lvy在2008-9-1 23:32:00的发言:

(A)          Many new water-treatment plants have been built in the last five years in the rural county.

请问A为什么就是不对呢

明显就是削弱阿,五年来说都装了water treatment plants,证明根本不是sanitation的contribution阿

请大牛们给我一点思路,谢谢

建厂不一定等于能处理干净。


作者: minirainbow    时间: 2008-10-9 22:00

我对答案(A)也有同样的疑惑……

真的是因为答案(A)缺乏建厂就不一定可以制造干净的水吗

可是原题中也是使用非限定形容词子句
        
“, which made for cleaner water this year”来补充water-treatment plants.

所以说water-treatment plants用来制造干净的水是本来就不容置疑的事实吧?

我的理解有误吗

 

请大家指教……


作者: yearyear    时间: 2008-10-12 00:49

about (a)

my two cents: health officials' explanation是说improved water treatment plant 的 sanitary condition,a选项虽说已经建厂,但没说工厂的sanitary condition是否合格。


作者: sunshine365    时间: 2008-10-12 22:30
A不构成削弱,原因:

题干中说

improved sanitary conditions at water-treatment plants 导致今年的水质变好,继而减少了疾病发生。题干中
并没有提这些水厂是什么时候建设的,所以什么时候建厂没有关系,关键是什么时候improved sanitary conditions at water-treatment plants

如果把A改成“Many new water-treatment plants have
            
improved sanitary conditions
            
in the last five years in the rural county.”那么就构成削弱。

    

            

作者: JJUUHHUU    时间: 2009-1-24 22:32
强,明白了~~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3