Zelda: Dr. L, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. L. has claimed that his theory is irrefutablely correct.
Anson: Then Dr.L is not a responsible psychologist, Dr.L's evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson's argument?
A. Dr. L's evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
B. Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disputed.
C. No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explainations.
D. Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
E. Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
考古发现,有NN支持B,可是答案是C.不知道这题现在是否有定论,答案是B OR C? THX
我说说我的理解
Anson:
结论 Dr.L is not a responsible psychologist,
前提1.Dr.L's evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct.
2. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.
将B取非
B. Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories CAN responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disputed.
明显与Anson的论点相左, 所以为 correct ans is B
C,表示they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.这个论点与Anson的论证一致,取非也无weaken结论, 所以ans:C不能从A的argument中推出
请指教
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |