ChaseDream

标题: GWD-21-14 [打印本页]

作者: wangtsong 时间: 2008-1-12 00:23
标题: GWD-21-14

When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined within narrow margins. Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current standards.
Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings.
None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the regions where the paintings were created.

how to explain D? thanks!

作者: Lily0515 时间: 2008-1-12 05:14

None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.

找assumption

本文结论表示因为old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards就必须要有d这个assumption也就是前提必须是例如paper…etc这类的material不会易受temperature and humidity的影响

作者: wangtsong 时间: 2008-1-12 12:18
Thanks. I get it.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)