ChaseDream

标题: 请问关于文艺复兴时期的女性的那篇在哪有原文和题目啊 [打印本页]

作者: zyh0218 时间: 2008-1-6 05:14
标题: 请问关于文艺复兴时期的女性的那篇在哪有原文和题目啊

如题，谢谢

作者: WandaRocket 时间: 2008-1-6 15:02

很多人考到后说：和以下 GWD 文章不同！虽然也是关于妇女和文艺复兴！

但以下 GWD 还是可以参考

Line (5)

(10)

(15)

(20)

(25)

(30)

(35)

(40)
Historians who study European
women of the Renaissance try to mea-
sure “independence,” “options,” and
other indicators of the degree to which
the expression of women’s individuality
was either permitted or suppressed.
Influenced by Western individualism,
these historians define a peculiar form
of personhood: an innately bounded
unit, autonomous and standing apart
from both nature and society. An
anthropologist, however, would contend
that a person can be conceived in ways
other than as an “individual.” In many
societies a person’s identity is not
intrinsically unique and self-contained
but instead is defined within a complex
web of social relationships.
In her study of the fifteenth-century
Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a
historian who specializes in European
women of the Renaissance attributes
individual intention and authorship of
actions to her subject. This historian
assumes that Alessandra had goals
and interests different from those of her
sons, yet much of the historian’s own
research reveals that Alessandra
acted primarily as a champion of her
sons’ interests, taking their goals as
her own. Thus Alessandra conforms
more closely to the anthropologist’s
notion that personal motivation is
embedded in a social context. Indeed,
one could argue that Alessandra did
not distinguish her personhood from
that of her sons. In Renaissance
Europe the boundaries of the con-
ceptual self were not always firm
and closed and did not necessarily
coincide with the boundaries of
the bodily self.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:

The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

A. Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women of her time because she was a widow.
B. Alessandra was aware that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.
C. Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows in her society.
D. Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.
E. Alessandra was exceptional because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?

A. Alessandra was atypical of her time and was therefore an inappropriate choice for the subject of the historian’s research.
B. In order to bolster her thesis, the historian adopted the anthropological perspective on personhood.
C. The historian argues that the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed in Renaissance Europe.
D. In her study, the historian reverts to a traditional approach that is out of step with the work of other historians of Renaissance Europe.
E. The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q37:
In the first paragraph, the author of the passage mentions a contention that would be made by an anthropologist most likely in order to

A. present a theory that will be undermined in the discussion of a historian’s study later in the passage
B. offer a perspective on the concept of personhood that can usefully be applied to the study of women in Renaissance Europe
C. undermine the view that the individuality of European women of the Renaissance was largely suppressed
D. argue that anthropologists have applied the Western concept of individualism in their research
E. lay the groundwork for the conclusion that Alessandra’s is a unique case among European women of the Renaissance whose lives have been studied by historians

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q38:
According to the passage, much of the research on Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) supports which of the following conclusions?

A. Alessandra used her position as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons.
B. Alessandra unwillingly sacrificed her own interests in favor of those of her sons.
C. Alessandra’s actions indicate that her motivations and intentions were those of an independent individual.
D. Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action.
E. Alessandra regarded her sons’ goals and interests as her own.

Ans E B E
(修正答案)

Version 1
某人说文艺复兴时期的女性地位很低，在家受丈夫和父亲的管教，没有经济地位，等等。另一个人出来说，这个人没有考虑到其他的一些因素：文艺复兴这个时候的女性能够在一些宗教活动中自由的表达自己的观点。文章两段。

Version 2
文艺复兴时期妇女的地位是否改变？
G说没有，他考虑到一段时期妇女面对的环境并没有改善，（来自家庭社会等）。此时，另外一人认为实际上妇女在很多方面的地位有了改善，比如他们猛更自由的表达自己的观点，这从当时一些妇女写的书可以看出来。
题目1，主题。（针对某一时期的情况的讨论什么的）
题目2，第2个人认为哪个方面得到改善。（直接定位，好象是什么self expression)

Version 3
以前大家都以为中世纪的妇女已经可以像男人一样很自由的表达自己的思想或者拥有政治权力了，但是跳出来一个历史学家XX说，不，她们仍然在很多方面受到限制，然后举例说怎么怎么样。后来又跳出来一群人说，不，XX fails to take into account of …… 我记得一个很关键的词，self-expression，也是机经里的题目了。

Version 4
文艺复兴时期的女性，有个女人的研究成果说她们的经济，政治，xxx地位都没有提高（这个地方有个except题）
这是从meddle age开始 continuing 到复兴时期的。有主旨题。

此外还考了“文艺复兴时期妇女的处境”，先说某学者是第一个强调那时妇女的处境很大程度上只是中世纪状态的延续，再说另一个学者的不同论点

Version 5
p1: 先举了一个人的观点，然后又举了另一个人的观点反对前一个人，然后feminie sociologist认为这两个人的观点都不对
p2: 说为了解决这个问题，讨论中世纪时期女性地位，具体没太看懂……
p3: 举了一个K的例子，说她研究文艺复兴时期女性的书信，并把他们分成两组，然后得出了什么什么结论，但是这个结论也有不对的地方（最后一句话）
题目
其中一道题是关于整个第三段的，具体忘了
还有一个题问：K和其他研究者的研究方法有什么不同？
还有一个问：K研究的女性是什么样的女性？……这篇重点在第三段，问题几乎都是围绕这个K出的

Version 6
一位M作家很写实的描述当时女性的生活，物质生活似乎很压抑，但后来又出来一位学者说：这个M作家缺少了某些观点，谈到了一些精神层面的问题

Version 7
GWD-3-Q35-37文艺复兴妇女的独立性题。连同题目exactly一致。看到时很开心。
GWD题。文艺复兴时期女性个人独立的研究，一个叫阿里桑德拉的女性把她儿子的目标当成自己的目标的那篇文章。
但是有一题是GWD里没有的题。
GWD 3 -Q 35-37，关于widow的文章。第一题问的角度不一样，不过选项一样；其他三题完全一样
GWD 文艺复兴寡妇那一道，题目有所改动，是四道。一道主题题，三道细节题，主要是问第二段的细节。不难。

Version 8
第一段：好像是关于文艺复兴时期妇女地位。
一来就讲某个人认为妇女地位是 equal 的观点已成为后来人的众矢之的（有题）。还有另一个人的观点走了另一个极端，认为妇女地位是不equal。但是后来的 trend是很多人对这两种观点都进行了批判，大概都中庸的态度啦！
第二段：提了一个具体人的观点，就是既肯定又有批判的那种，很长，还有好几道题是根据这段内容出的，其中有一道题我很拿不准，问第二段的这个人和trend 里那些人有什么不同，但我找了半天也没找到出题点，最后选了一个Ｅ，好像。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-8 10:50:56编辑过]

作者: WandaRocket 时间: 2008-1-6 15:07
呃...後面重複的我刪不掉

作者: NYUchaser 时间: 2008-1-7 22:29
讨论:

LZ的答案有点问题吧
我从gwd里面看到的答案是d,e,b啊,gwd里面就前面三道题

作者: hohohope 时间: 2008-1-7 23:57

恩,GWD里的答案是D E B,没有最后一个~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)