ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]SC大全885-SA 22 [打印本页]

作者: 荷叶田田 时间: 2007-12-22 21:16
标题: [讨论]SC大全885-SA 22
22.
As recently as 1950, tuberculosis was never curable unless sequestered in sanitariums; today, the drug Isoniazid has made such treatment obsolete.
(A) unless sequestered
(B) without sequestering
(C) without being sequestered
(D) unless it was sequestered
(E) unless patients were sequestered

答案是E，我选的A.pateints可以省略嘛？我觉得有时候不说其实是会产生歧义的，而不是从什么简洁的角度考虑。

Just do it. I never give up.

我在论坛里搜索过了，collection里没有关于这个题目的讨论貌似~

作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-12-22 23:11

以下是引用荷叶田田在2007-12-22 21:16:00的发言：
22.
As recently as 1950, tuberculosis was never curable unless sequestered in sanitariums; today, the drug Isoniazid has made such treatment obsolete.
(A) unless sequestered
(B) without sequestering
(C) without being sequestered
(D) unless it was sequestered
(E) unless patients were sequestered

答案是E，我选的A.pateints可以省略嘛？我觉得有时候不说其实是会产生歧义的，而不是从什么简洁的角度考虑。

还是要看意思的:肺结核本身并不会挤在疗养院里。只有病人能

作者: 荷叶田田 时间: 2007-12-22 23:14
就是说这种结构unless,without之类的词后面如果没有插入其他名词，一般就是修饰前面那个名词咯？

作者: easy4meeeeee 时间: 2007-12-22 23:22

unless是连词，不能做定语修饰前面的词，要用unless必须主谓完整

without being sequestered 可以做定语

作者: 荷叶田田 时间: 2007-12-23 19:53

好的谢谢

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)