ChaseDream

标题: GWD-02-17 [打印本页]

作者: wangtsong 时间: 2007-12-11 19:38
标题: GWD-02-17

Q17:

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

why E? why the effective-question is unreasonable?

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-12-12 04:35

请楼主题目贴完整…..帮助后人查阅……..

作者: Lilac29 时间: 2007-12-12 12:47
E is unrelated answer choice.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)