ChaseDream

标题: GWD-02-38 [打印本页]

作者: wangtsong 时间: 2007-12-11 19:20
标题: GWD-02-38

Q38:

Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival

E是什么逻辑？

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-12-12 04:42

这题其实就是要找出这篇文章它逻辑推理上犯了什么错误……

作者: Lilac29 时间: 2007-12-12 12:51
这个argument混淆了充分和必要条件。

作者: wangtsong 时间: 2007-12-12 19:25

Oh, 我理解了，谢谢！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)