ChaseDream

标题: 11月CRJJ中的天山7-17 黑脸地方变了请大家一起讨论 [打印本页]

作者: 飞跃Pacific 时间: 2007-12-5 16:01
标题: 11月CRJJ中的天山7-17 黑脸地方变了请大家一起讨论

与天山-7-17类似，但是黑的地方变了。

As a large corporation in small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience目的, so

each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees要反驳的策略.（答案是要

被评价的策略。评价和反驳有什么不同呢？） Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of

graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon

after completing the program. 用来支持反驳的证据 Hachnut does use performance during the

program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, 事实目标but both this

function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways.用来反驳策略不

需要的基础 Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should

discontinue the sponsorship program. 结论，反驳开始的观点

请教一下大家，这道黑脸题，每一小句的作用。本月CRjj。但黑脸的地方变了，所以要把每句读搞清楚。

每句后面是我的想法。还请NN指正！

附原题

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.
The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.
The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.
The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.
The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-5 16:05:47编辑过]

作者: zhaokiki 时间: 2007-12-5 16:22