ChaseDream

标题: GMAT885 S18-7 新问 [打印本页]

作者: easy4meeeeee 时间: 2007-11-23 02:42
标题: GMAT885 S18-7 新问

7. Although the coordination of monetary policy can help facilitate the orderly financing of existing
imbalances, it is unlikely that its effect on their size is significant in the absence of an appropriate fiscal adjustment.

(A) it is unlikely that its effect on their size is significant

(B) it is unlikely that the size of their effect would be significant

(D) the significance of their effect on its size is unlikely（E）

(E) its effect on their size is not likely to be significant

前人关于A和E中的it指代问题的讨论已经非常清楚了

我有一个新的问题：

their显然用来指代imbalances,可是imbalances是所有格

有条语法规则是所有格不能拿来指代的是不是又要灵活掌握了？如何灵活使用，请高手指点～

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-11-23 04:25

这题ans E吗????

作者: lissy_721 时间: 2007-11-23 12:57

顶，问的好！我也想知道

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-11-24 04:35

说说我的看法

我是以be likely to be固定惯用出发

再来看是否有不必要的指代

但五个选项都用their你没的挑

所以就confirm答案了,不要再争扎下去

但你的精神令人敬偑…….

作者: easy4meeeeee 时间: 2007-11-25 15:35

答案确定是E

A. it its 指代不同所以错

以前的讨论：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=94634&id=14207&skin=0

关于所有格被指代的另外一个例子
After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help boost cargoes into space at significantly lower costs than current methods permit.

(A) tested that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two or help
(B) tested that could eventually have the capability of propelling aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or to help
(C) tested, eventually able to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours, or helping
(D) tested, and it eventually could propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours, or helping
(E) tested, and it could eventually have the capability to propel aircraft anywhere in the world within two hours or help

A和E中的that和it都是指代a new type of jet engine中的engine

其实我不是挣扎，我是被很多“所谓的绝对性错误”害的比较惨
比如，当我刚知道所有格不能被指代的时候，高兴的认为又有一个新的办法来排除选项了。但通过这道题，又要从新看这个问题了

推荐看下这个帖子，非常经典的讨论，也是少有的争议未果题
 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=42296&page=1

另外，likely to 确实比likely that简洁，但是不能以此排除选项

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-25 15:36:38编辑过]

作者: ciscogeek 时间: 2007-11-27 00:19
看来刚开始是练招术，到最终还是无招胜有招了。

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-11-27 04:03

嗯…有做过功课很认真….

对了以后别称我“前辈”了!我不是NN…

因为我是从很菜的菜鸟一路看大N的解说走来…

这过程经历很久虽然我注册日期是2006

其实早在2005大四时就开始准备，2006被鸡杀

天份不佳一路走到现在才开始约略能看出答案选项….

目前正在备战阶段…等候公司3星期留职停薪通知中…

改称“老菜鸟”－简洁原则:“老菜”好了…

比菜鸟还要高一阶但还不到NN地位…

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-27 4:04:41编辑过]

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)