实在是没有找到这题的讨论链接,才发这个帖子,哪位可以帮忙解释一下这题?
74. Small-business groups are lobbying to defeat proposed federal legislation that would substantially raise the federal minimum wage. This opposition is surprising since the legislation they oppose would, for the first time, exempt all small businesses from paying any minimum wage.
Which of the following, if true, would best explain the opposition of small-business groups to the proposed legislation?
(A) Under the current federal minimum-wage law, most small businesses are required to pay no less than the minimum wage to their employees.
(B) In order to attract workers, small companies must match the wages offered by their larger competitors, and these competitors would not be exempt under the proposed laws.
(C) The exact number of companies that are currently required to pay no less than the minimum wage but that would be exempt under the proposed laws is unknown.
(D) Some states have set their own minimum wages—in some cases, quite a bit above the level of the minimum wage mandated by current federal law—for certain key industries.
(E) Service companies make up the majority of small businesses and they generally employ more employees per dollar of revenues than do retail or manufacturing businesses.
badito将错了吧
B和原文多没有提到中大公司有没有被豁免
你是怎么的出来的，这样解释虽然有道理但原文并没有给出，若要按你说的新法律提案中大公司并没有被豁免，原文因改为not exempt all large businesses from paying any minium wage.
那小公司如果自己涨工资不也能和大公司抗衡吗，D选项如果个别州的最低工资标准高于国家的最低标准，那么小公司如果被排除了，则将支付更高的工资，如果这样假设呢？
解释范围变小了..从整体变成局部州了...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |