ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD18-18-19 [打印本页]

作者: even2007 时间: 2007-11-17 22:04
标题: [求助]GWD18-18-19

New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

A. provide compelling support for classifying
B. provide compelling support for the classification of
C. provides compelling support to the classification of
D. provides compelling support for classifying
E. provides compelling support to classify

我選了E，表目的provide to. or support to. 有support for doing這種方式嗎，如果有的話這里怎么判斷哪個應該優先考慮呀。

答案為D

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-17 22:05:05编辑过]

作者: bandito 时间: 2007-11-17 22:20
事实上只有support for ...而反而没有support to ...这种说法

作者: even2007 时间: 2007-11-18 15:55

那為什么不能看成provide (support) to do呢。

作者: dtstruggle 时间: 2007-11-18 16:28

以下是引用bandito在2007-11-17 22:20:00的发言：
事实上只有support for ...而反而没有support to ...这种说法

一语惊醒梦中人。。thx

作者: even2007 时间: 2007-11-18 17:59

习惯用语: come to one's support
来支持某人; give support to
支持, 支援; lend support to
支持, 支援; in support
【军】供支援用的, 后备的, 第二线的; in support of
帮助[支援]..., 为...辩护证明

沒有看到support for的用法……

作者: bandito 时间: 2007-11-18 21:47

我之前没解释清楚。我的意思是没有support to +动词进行时这种说法，只有support for +动词进行时这样的结构。

作者: lzbamoy 时间: 2008-3-12 13:42

give support to / lend support to

exerpted from the DICTIONARY.

But, only provide sth for sth is plausible. Provide sth to do sth is infeasible.

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-5-22 23:43
up

作者: rorarora 时间: 2008-8-4 00:01
up

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)