ChaseDream

标题: 请高手指点一题 (刘振民语法里面的) [打印本页]

作者: siwfly 时间: 2007-11-17 18:51
标题: 请高手指点一题 (刘振民语法里面的)

4-12

For many people, household labor remains demanding even if able to afford household appliances their grandparents would find a miracle.

C. even if they can afford household appliances their grandparents would have found miraculous.

E. even if they are able to afford household appliances which would have been a miracle to their grandparents.

很明显错误的选项我就不贴出来了，答案是C, 解释是因为 can 优先于 be able to，我觉得这个解释太牵强了。因为如果是选C的话，那整个句子不就有三个谓语动词，但是只有一个连词？？？那这种错误不是应该更不能原谅马？如果解释成 appliances that their.. 省略了that, 那么如果后面直接是 found.. 我可以理解，但是用了would have found.

请高手指点一下！谢谢了

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-17 18:51:46编辑过]

作者: bandito 时间: 2007-11-17 20:08

C正确。但是和can有限于able to无关。E错误是因为使用了which。which的使用需要用逗号隔开。否则必须用that连接。C其实就是省略了that而直接接的their grandparents...。

你对该题答案的解释的怀疑是正确的。如果是正式解释的话，写出这个解释的人太不谨慎太不负责了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-17 20:08:19编辑过]

作者: siwfly 时间: 2007-11-17 20:25

谢谢啦！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)