ChaseDream

标题: prep 95 关于状语伴随结果 [打印本页]

作者: qwedcxzas 时间: 2007-11-12 21:18
标题: prep 95 关于状语伴随结果

95. (29661-!-item-!-188;#058&003962)

Unlike frogs that metamorphose from tadpoles into adults within a one-year period, it takes three to four years for the mountain yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada to reach adulthood, and so they are restricted to deeper bodies of water that do not dry up in summer or freeze solid in winter.

(A) it takes three to four years for the mountain yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada to reach adulthood, and so they are

(B) it takes the mountain yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada three to four years until it reaches adulthood, and therefore it is

(D) mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four years until they reach adulthood, thus

(E) mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four years to reach adulthood, and so they are

想请问的是D选项,thus restricted为何prep解释说”伴随状语不符合逻辑”?

正确答案E中,and so they are restricted不是有”因此他们受限于较深的水…”之意吗?

那D在这里用分词短语表伴随结果,修饰前面一句(mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four years to reach adulthood先用正确答案来看)不是有前面这一句话,导致他们受限于深水之意吗???

另外一题

69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

为什么用allowing不好呢?因为这个法案的通过,使得公司能够…也是表伴随结果状与修饰前一个句子啊

(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

快要考试了
麻烦大家指点一下
谢谢

作者: vivian_chi 时间: 2007-11-13 09:21

95 伴随状语不合逻辑的意思是，要看原句句意是不是要强调所以后面的意思，thus+分词和and so最大的区别，就是一个是主要地位，一个是次要地位。句中的意思明显是要说他们受限，而不是强调他们成年，所以E更好。

69 主语究竟是谁允许？是事件还是act?当然是后者了，所以这里用allowing是不对的~

lz对伴随状语的理解还不是很好，不能只关注doing表结果这个事实，首先你要关注的是什么时候可以用doing表结果，prep已经指导的我们很清楚了，我找出来你再次研读~相信可以加深理解：

1 在句子中是独立成分，和主句有逻辑关系

2 doing是和谓语动词相比，且意义居于次要地位

3 doing和主句动作同时发生

4 动作发出者和主句主语相同

作者: dtstruggle 时间: 2007-11-13 09:27

95. (29661-!-item-!-188;#058&003962)

由unlike，ABC排除。

D的分词定语离要修饰的名词实在太远了，可以引起歧义。 mountain yellow-legged frogs ，，，the Sierra Nevada take 到底是修饰谁呢。

69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)

allow多与法令法规搭配，这道题有一个考点是动词固定用法

作者: qwedcxzas 时间: 2007-11-13 10:04

感谢两位的回答我再研究看看

谢谢

作者: zhengjingzhe 时间: 2009-7-17 13:30
up

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)