ChaseDream

标题: 大全-补充-66 [打印本页]

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-12-8 13:28
标题: 大全-补充-66
66. In the mid-1920’s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance.
(A) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance
(B) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance
(C) for investigating what are the effects in workers’ performance that changes in working conditions would cause
(D) that investigated changes in working conditions’ effects on workers’ performance
(E) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance
答案:B, 这道题答案中的on究竟是跟effects对应还是changes, 做了两次都选错了. 请大家指教!

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2003-12-8 13:45
it sucked, i didn't get the right answer, but now i understand:
1, 'on' here is connected to 'changes', meaning how changes in work condition will affect the workers' performance
2, u will not consider ACD
3, E is OK but redundant, what clause= noun. i was trapped there

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-12-8 14:22
Yes, my answer is E. But in B, I think the that clause is the attributive clause of effects, and the "on" is related to "effects". Don't you think so?

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2003-12-8 14:35
yes, but 'the changes .. on ...(workers) performance" is not a problem here. and why' investigaing"?

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-12-8 14:48
Read the question again, I make clear that why investigating is better than to investigate. Because the whole sentence is "... works... was ...... of experiments", after that we should choose a choice to modify the experiments, not to describe the purpose of the whole sentence. So here "investigating" is better than "to investigate". Right?

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-21 05:37
这题还是没有明白为什么要用分词短语，不用不定式，哪位高手指点一下？

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-21 05:38
同样做定语修饰前面的名词时，不定式和分词短语有什么区别？

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-21 23:43
UP

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-22 22:10
up

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-2-22 22:44
to表示目的，作定语只能是分词

作者: tianwan 时间: 2004-2-23 00:40
to可以做定语吧？

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-23 08:33
不定式肯定是可以做定语的。比如：the way to do sth. is ....只是不明白什么时候该用不定式，什么时候用分词。

比如：

15. Acid rain and snow result from the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids.fficeffice" />

(A) with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

(B) with atmospheric water vapor producing highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

(D) and atmospheric water vapor which have produced sulfuric and nitric acids which are highly corrosive（E）

(E) and atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

这道题to produce我觉得应该做定语跳跃修饰reaction, 做定语。但为什么用不定式不用分词？或者定语从句？不明白。

作者: tangyi79 时间: 2004-2-23 09:33
E is not ok.

Because it shouldn't omit the "that" before "changes".

But still don't know the usages of "to do" and "doing".

作者: tianwan 时间: 2004-2-23 11:53
up

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-23 11:56:03编辑过]

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-2-23 22:46
up

作者: 云开 时间: 2005-11-16 03:26

B是否可理解为investigating the effects分词做定语修饰experiments, that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance 定语从句修饰effects.

所以E不能省略changes前面的that.

作者: pengfei1102 时间: 2006-5-28 11:31

以下是引用云开在2005-11-16 3:26:00的发言：

谁把这道题详细解释一下~ ？

作者: mejor 时间: 2006-7-12 17:55

請牛牛講下呢？

作者: kathy8446 时间: 2006-7-31 18:42

E是错的，因为这里的what从句没有谓语

不过，还是不明白这里为什么用分词来修饰，感觉应该用that从句要更好，不是说分词表示“一直”的含义或强调重复性动作？

D就是错在working conditions' effects这个所有格吗？

作者: xiaowan 时间: 2006-9-23 10:10

66. In the mid-1920’s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance.

(A) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance

(B) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

(D) that investigated changes in working conditions’ effects on workers’ performance（B）

(E) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

懂了,D的问题在介词短语on worker's performance可以作状语也可以作定语

但是这里B的分词作定语似乎也不是太好的,相比之下,B将就一下吧

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-23 10:43:51编辑过]

作者: 盈儿 时间: 2006-11-10 20:56

从句意的角度来看

B,changes in conditions

D,changes in effects

they focus on different points.

作者: wanjing119 时间: 2006-11-28 02:20

不懂

作者: shanexwang 时间: 2006-11-28 05:23
(E) to investigate what (the) effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance
I would choose E unless they can get rid of "the"

作者: huoduoduo 时间: 2006-11-30 11:40

66.我也好晕。不过我分析出了以下几点，大家批判啊！！

A.as to后面的逻辑主语不清。their指代也有问题。

B。正选

C. 首先，不说别的，what are应该改成what…………are,变陈述语气。
　　其次，选项用的cause effect不如直接用动词affect好

D.' effect有问题。首先无生命应该用of，其次它加在conditions后面，也不理想

E.effects 和changes中间缺of

至于investigate的形式，C.E肯定不对，用不着表目的。至于分词还是从句，我觉得不是关键。

主要是要搞清是changes affect performance

大家批判啊！！

作者: cccccc0 时间: 2006-12-26 21:20
up

作者: abort 时间: 2006-12-28 01:50
请问(D)改成 that investigated effects of changes in working conditions on workers’ performance行不行？

作者: audreychenjj 时间: 2007-8-15 17:19

A中时态错误，investigate effects not changes；

B中用分词来修饰experiments，用that从句来修饰effects，on当然是跟effects，清晰简洁；

C中for用错，that从句修饰performance逻辑错；

D中investigate changes逻辑错，working conditions’ effects逻辑错；

E中缺少that来连接effects和它的宾语从句changes in working conditions would have，同时what从句缺少谓语，全部补出的话应为to investigate what the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance would be。

请指正！

作者: yinlixiao 时间: 2008-9-9 07:47
kankan

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)