165. 搜索过了，没有相关讨论！
(A) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as
(B) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, researchers have determined, making them many times more rare than
(C) There are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined, which makes the leopards many times more rare compared to
(D) Researchers have determined that, because of being poached and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, thus making them many more times as rare as
(E) Researchers have determined that, because of poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times more rare than
答案是E，我选的是B
请问:E中的这个their有没有歧义呢？就近指代的话，应该指代researchers.
解释说B的researchers have determined导致了后面making的修饰歧义.
我不明白这部分不是做插入语吗？那怎么会导致歧义呢？
E "their"满明显，不算歧义。
B 中 researchers have determined 其实没有问题。
B中 的“making them many times more rare than" 也没有歧义，但是他没有修饰的对象。所以错了。
E "their"满明显，不算歧义。
B 中 researchers have determined 其实没有问题。
B中 的“making them many times more rare than" 也没有歧义，但是他没有修饰的对象。所以错了。
thx,
原来是没有修饰对象哈~
分词不论做伴随状语/前句结果，都是伴随谓语动作。
而系表是一个状态，不会有同时间发生的伴随动作。
结论：伴随状语不能修饰系表结构。
E "their"满明显，不算歧义。
B 中 researchers have determined 其实没有问题。
B中 的“making them many times more rare than" 也没有歧义，但是他没有修饰的对象。所以错了。
我就没有选择E选项。
E "their" 从语法上看，指代前面的researchers ，但是从逻辑上看应该指代100 Arabian leopards
所以E选项应该是歧义啊。
哪位大牛指导 一下。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |