ChaseDream
标题: 这个JJ,把我搞晕了,请指教 [打印本页]
作者: saugaone 时间: 2007-10-24 07:10
标题: 这个JJ,把我搞晕了,请指教
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______.(注意看清题目说,下面哪个肯定是错误的)
- more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
- the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
- there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
- some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
- some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has
- more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
- the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
- there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
- some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
- some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has
作者: Icanw 时间: 2007-10-24 07:50
选B
in Springfield: total tourists S= tourists in hotel RA + tourists in other hotels
in Harristown: total tourists H= tourists in the largest hotel L+ tourists in other hotels
given S>H, and RA<L, then other hotels must exist in Springfield. -->the Royal Arms Hotel is not the only hotel in Springfield
作者: lisy 时间: 2007-10-24 08:06
B
其他都可能的,只有这个不可能,否则就自相矛盾了
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |