ChaseDream

标题: [求助]prep1-61 [打印本页]

作者: ilovecushi    时间: 2007-10-22 10:06
标题: [求助]prep1-61

61.    (34849-!-item-!-188;#058&007585)

 

Which of the following best completes the passage below?

 

At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North Sea, most participating countries favored uniform controls on the quality of effluents,
            whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent.  What must, of course, be shown, in order to avoid

excessively restrictive controls, is that __________.

 

(A) any uniform controls that are adopted are likely to be implemented without delay

(B) any substance to be made subject to controls can actually cause environmental damage

(C) the countries favoring uniform controls are those generating the largest quantities of effluents

(D) all of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present

(E) environmental damage already inflicted on the North Sea is reversible

請問為什麼是B呀 我選了B 可是我只是覺得他順眼 不知道為什麼~~~

 

請賜教

 


作者: ilovecushi    时间: 2007-10-23 13:08
sombody there~~~  please~
作者: lulu_odin    时间: 2008-5-1 16:47

同问


作者: windingcloud    时间: 2008-6-10 21:33
:)
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-10 21:34:34编辑过]

作者: windingcloud    时间: 2008-6-10 21:35

题干讲,控制effluentswhether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent。无论effluents是否引起了某种环境破坏

 

问题是in order to avoid excessively restrictive controls, what should be showen ...为了不过分的控制,那只有区分控制对环境有破坏的effluentsB讲控制的substance 是应该能够影响环境的物质。符合
作者: Journal    时间: 2009-7-16 16:28
D为什么错?
作者: Journal    时间: 2009-7-21 18:51
up
作者: Brilliance    时间: 2009-7-23 11:31
求解
作者: guyiyu1987    时间: 2009-8-31 18:53

试着解答一下,我本来也选了D,但是后来想想B是对的。

原文提议要total banned on effluents whether 他们是否造成了某种damage,但是又不能有不必要的controls,问怎么解决?

(B) any substance to be made subject to controls can actually cause environmental damage  以是否ACTUALLY造成污染为标准

(D) all of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present 标准被narrowed,不能以现在是否到达了North Sea为标准,缩小了enviornmental damage的范围


作者: 像风一样离去    时间: 2011-3-26 16:09
我不是很明白啊,我选了D。在B和D之间纠结了好久,一直不知道选什么,后来看到这句whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent.所以就选了D。
我是这样认为的,如果污染物质到不了北海,那你还要restrict它的排放就没必要了啊,也就是excessive restriction了啊,当然应该avoid.
反观B,如果这个污染物质都到不了北海,那你保护北海的会议要控制它干么呢?
讨论讨论,大家都是老前辈,我是个求知的菜鸟。
作者: horsecc    时间: 2011-3-28 11:54
whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent     我觉得就是因为这句才要选B  因为都控制了  所以才会产生过度控制的原因
作者: fuzheng602    时间: 2011-4-17 21:04
whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent.--是否环境破坏归因于排污,都要控制排污
那么in order to不过分控制,就要分清排污是否破坏环境,而不能以抵达北海为标准。
作者: 潇湘妃子zwhj    时间: 2012-2-4 15:11
请问这道题,或者这种题型,属于lawyer逻辑方法中的哪一类?
看了看好像没有这种类型吧。是main conclusion吗?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3