ChaseDream

标题: [求助]请教大全52 [打印本页]

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-12-3 21:43
标题: [求助]请教大全52
52.According to the Better Business Bureau, if you fail to advertise the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as prominently as that of the lowest, it violates the New York Consumer Protection Law.
(A) if you fail to advertise the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as prominently as that of the lowest, it
(B) if one fails to advertise the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as prominently as the lowest price, it
(C) failure to advertise the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as prominently as the lowest
(D) failure to advertise as prominently the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as the lowest
(E) failing to advertise as prominently the highest price in a range of prices for a service or products as that of the lowest
答案是C，我都理解不了句子意思，求教牛人这题目的思路
（只知道A，B错，it似乎指代了一个句子，不知道，对不对？？）

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-3 22:08
这里you 和后面的it不一致. B是同样的错误.如果it在这里指代前面那个句子的话,则前面的if从句就错了.

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-12-3 22:12
A，B我知道错啊，但是C，D，E怎么排除呢？？

还有句子意思我不懂

作者: fdkbaby 时间: 2003-12-3 22:26
A、B中it不能用来指代前面的条件从句

A、E中the highest price和that of the lowest，形式上不对称

D、E中应该是advertise the highest price prominently,而不是advertise prominently the highest price。prominently用来修饰advertise the highest price，而不单单是advertise这个动作。

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-3 22:30
According to the Better Business Bureau , failure (to advertise the highest price in a range of prices for a service or product as prominently as the lowest ) violates the (New York Consumer Protection )Law.
我把主要成分给你化出来了,括号里是定语.句子的意思是说根据Better Business Bureau ,如果没有没有把产品或者服务价格范围的最高价和最底价在广告中明确说出来,就是违反了纽约消费者保护法.
这个句子是很简单的结构.

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-12-3 22:31
谢谢楼上两位的指点

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-12-3 22:34
另外failing to也不如直接用名词failure好

作者: fdkbaby 时间: 2003-12-4 01:04

以下是引用fdkbaby在2003-12-3 22:26:00的发言：
A、B中it不能用来指代前面的条件从句

A、E中the highest price和that of the lowest，形式上不对称

D、E中应该是advertise the highest price prominently,而不是advertise prominently the highest price。prominently用来修饰advertise the highest price，而不单单是advertise这个动作。

刚才和另外一位朋友讨论了一下，觉得D、E的错误应该在于as...as中间不能有名词，中间只能放形容词或者副词

作者: bluestone1 时间: 2003-12-4 01:46

以下是引用fdkbaby在2003-12-4 1:04:00的发言：

刚才和另外一位朋友讨论了一下，觉得D、E的错误应该在于as...as中间不能有名词，中间只能放形容词或者副词

88.    Although many Whites, noting the presence of some Blacks in the middle class, think that the time for enforcing civil rights measures is past, Blacks generally are aware that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of a radical discrepancy as ever.
(A) that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of
(B) that average-income and unemployment figures show as wide
(C) that the average-income and unemployment figures are showing as wide of
(D) of average-income and unemployment figures that show as wide of
(E) of figures for average income and unemployment showing as wide

Right answer：B

证明 as + adj.+  .... as 之间是可以有名词的

as + adv.+  .... as 之间是否可以有名词的？还待考证

C 比 D 好是因为把 as prominently as 连在一起更清晰

作者: bluestone1 时间: 2003-12-4 02:06
刚把大全之中所有 as  ... as 结构滤了一遍

1、 as + adj. + n. + as  的用法有好几处

2、 as + adv. + n. + as  的用法  没有

      只有一个 as much of  + n. + as 的用法，也不是直接跟名词的

姑且可以认为 as + adv. + n+ as 用法不为 ETS 所接受

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-12-4 22:55
感谢几位，几位的钻研精神令人敬佩

作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-3 22:10
顶一下！
为什么选c不选d，还有别的解释么？？我还是想不通。。。

作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-2-4 16:45
up!

作者: gmat700+ 时间: 2004-9-14 12:49

关于这个as……as……的比较结构，我一直觉得非常模糊，不知道在使用它时的基本原则是什么。自己体会了一下，觉得as ……as中间好像只能放要进行比较的东东，比如这道题，就是要比较prominently的程度，所以就只能把prominently放在as……as里。

不敢确定，希望大家能来讨论一下。

作者: 携隐 时间: 2005-6-12 17:03
D为什么错，还是觉得很模糊，NN们能不能再讲解一下？

作者: peachball 时间: 2006-10-14 08:17

会不会因为修饰有歧异,prominently可能修饰the highest price

顶~~~~~~~~谁能解答

作者: everann 时间: 2006-10-21 20:43
我好象听到OG在耳边阴魂不散地说在as..as之间放太多的东西会模糊句意让人难以理解..

作者: Rayakawr 时间: 2007-7-21 22:13
B中it不能指代one吗? B不对是不是因为应该是"if..., will",it后面应该用will violate呢?

作者: Rayakawr 时间: 2007-8-4 17:40
up

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-6-28 11:43
up

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-8-17 17:17
up

作者: allenhb 时间: 2008-9-29 13:32

5年前的题啊~~~~~~~

至今还没讨论出结果

作者: ztiamot 时间: 2008-10-9 13:47
引用xianwharton：
大家看这两个OG 上的句子
og253：refer as clearly to the (noun weather) as the programme....
og156:dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads do
可
看出
885-12-21并不是修饰语和修饰对象分得太开的问题，如要说分家C中的prominently和advertise分离的也太远了，当初我就是因此
才将C排除的，至于修饰对象的问题prominently是副词不可能去修饰price ，而且看og253clearly
明显修饰的是refer而不是weather。

继续问 up

作者: lcy19812000 时间: 2009-1-6 11:03

这个句子我跟楼主一样看不懂意思。仔细想一想，还不是as...as中间放什么的问题。

更主要的是advertise（v1.） highest－price（n1.） as prominently（adv.） as advertise（v2.） lowest－price（n2.）句子结构让人费解；

按道理说adv.修饰v.，as...as后比较的是前后两个v.。本题省略了advertise（v2.）直接跟名词 lowest－price（n2.），造成是在比两个n.的感觉。

也许有人会说既然有adv.在，就不可能出现修饰n.的歧异，所以就可以省。但我认为as...as本身对于结构对称的要求很高，害怕重复最多将实意动词改为助动词，而主谓不能轻易就省略掉。

很困惑，欢迎大家讨论。

作者: lcy19812000 时间: 2009-1-6 11:07

这个句子我跟楼主一样看不懂意思。仔细想一想，还不是as...as中间放什么的问题。

更主要的是advertise（v1.） highest－price（n1.） as prominently（adv.） as advertise（v2.） lowest－price（n2.）句子结构让人费解；

按道理说adv.修饰v.，as...as后比较的是前后两个v.。本题省略了advertise（v2.）直接跟名词 lowest－price（n2.），造成是在比两个n.的感觉。

很困惑，欢迎大家讨论。

作者: lcy19812000 时间: 2009-1-6 11:10

这个句子我跟楼主一样看不懂意思。仔细想一想，还不是as...as中间放什么的问题。

更主要的是advertise（v1.） highest－price（n1.） as prominently（adv.） as advertise（v2.） lowest－price（n2.）句子结构让人费解；

按道理说adv.修饰v.，as...as后比较的是前后两个v.。本题省略了advertise（v2.）直接跟名词 lowest－price（n2.），造成是在比两个n.的感觉。

很困惑，欢迎大家讨论。

作者: lcy19812000 时间: 2009-1-6 11:21

这个句子我跟楼主一样看不懂意思。仔细想一想，还不是as...as中间放什么的问题。

更主要的是advertise（v1.） highest－price（n1.） as prominently（adv.） as advertise（v2.） lowest－price（n2.）句子结构因为省略掉v2.造成不完整的困惑；

按道理说adv.修饰v.，as...as后比较的是前后两个v.。本题省略了advertise（v2.）直接跟名词 lowest－price（n2.），造成是在比两个n.的感觉。

很困惑，欢迎大家讨论。

作者: lcy19812000 时间: 2009-1-6 11:25

系统问题吧。一连发了四个同样的贴。大家见谅啊！！！

另外，我看过比主谓省谓语，却没看过比动宾省动词的。

各位能不能给我举个例啊？

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-6 11:26:57编辑过]

作者: lovebb4ever 时间: 2009-8-9 15:51

以下是引用Rayakawr在2007/7/21 22:13:00的发言：
B中it不能指代one吗? B不对是不是因为应该是"if..., will",it后面应该用will violate呢?

同问。且，b中的it为什么不能指代前面整个句子呢？

水平比较差。。。还请路过的nn们解惑。不胜感激！！

作者: toom 时间: 2011-6-4 17:23
should compare two "to" as following:

failure to advise the highest price in blabla..as frequently as (to advise) the lowest price (in blabla...).
two (fragments) are understood. What bother me is that the location of "as frequently as", which is not just adjacent to the modified VERB advise(just as D), maybe ETS prefer the idiomatic expression here ??

作者: toom 时间: 2011-6-5 10:39
大全88.Although many Whites, noting the presence of some Blacks in the middle class, think that the time for enforcing civil rights measures is past, Blacks generally are aware that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of a radical discrepancy as ever.
(A) that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of
(B) that average-income and unemployment figures show as wide
(C) that the average-income and unemployment figures are showing as wide of
(D) of average-income and unemployment figures that show as wide of
(E) of figures for average income and unemployment showing as wide

作者: toom 时间: 2011-6-5 10:41
大全88.Although many Whites, noting the presence of some Blacks in the middle class, think that the time for enforcing civil rights measures is past, Blacks generally are aware that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of a radical discrepancy as ever.
(A) that the figures for average income and unemployment show as wide of
(B) that average-income and unemployment figures show as wide
(C) that the average-income and unemployment figures are showing as wide of
(D) of average-income and unemployment figures that show as wide of
(E) of figures for average income and unemployment showing as wide

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)