ChaseDream

标题: TT GWD11-9 [打印本页]

作者: sunqimin 时间: 2007-9-28 23:19
标题: TT GWD11-9

Q9:

The population of desert tortoises in Targland’s Red
Desert has declined, partly because they are captured for sale as pets and partly because people riding all-terrain vehicles have damaged their habitat. Targland plans to halt this population decline by blocking the current access routes into the desert and announcing new regulations to allow access only on foot. Targland’s officials predict that these measures will be adequate, since it is difficult to collect the tortoises without a vehicle.

Which of the following would it be most important to establish in order to evaluate the officials’ prediction?

Whether possessing the tortoises as pets remains legally permissible in Targland
Whether Targland is able to enforce the regulations with respect to all-terrain vehicle entry at points other than the current access routes
Whether the Red
Desert tortoises are most active during the day or at night
Whether people who travel on foot in the Red
Desert often encounter the tortoises
Whether the Targland authorities held public hearings before restricting entry by vehicle into the Red
Desert

答案是B，请哪位NN帮我分析一下思路呀，谢谢~~

作者: adcc5460 时间: 2007-9-28 23:50
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: flyrabbitfei 时间: 2007-9-29 10:14

同意~

作者: sunqimin 时间: 2007-9-30 16:39

谢谢楼上的NN,题目分析得很清楚.但是想问一下,B的选项的意思是"是否T能够实施对于旅游车除了目前的进入通道以外,其他通道都不准旅游车进入的法规",是这个意思么?就是说是否目前的进入通道以及其他通道都不准旅游车进入?

谢谢~~~~

作者: NOTALOSER 时间: 2008-11-21 14:21
结论说T地的计划，也就是block the current access routes的计划will be adequate，那么是否adequate就要看是否有它因了。如果有除了current access route外的入口，那么仅仅block current access routes显然是不够的。B就讲了这样一个它因，如果它因不能被遏制，那么结论被weaken，如果它因可以被遏制，结论就没有问题。

作者: lala974 时间: 2011-6-15 06:17
up up

作者: riclyme 时间: 2012-10-5 11:31
upup

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)