ChaseDream

标题: 到底是读结构还是细节? [打印本页]

作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-9-24 07:54
标题: 到底是读结构还是细节?
试了两次结构
错的无数多
因为很多混淆的选项是测试细节的
读细节把,又容易沉浸其中
想和大家讨论讨论
怎样才算是沉迷于细节,结构应该把握到什么样的程度
谢谢~

作者: Reaperowlish    时间: 2007-9-25 20:24

20s construction reading, who , when ,what, attitude, Then a fast detail reading, important positions marked.


作者: icewarm    时间: 2007-9-27 12:16
Structure is the KEY!

        

You read for topic, scope, main idea, author's attitude, STRUCTURE!

        

Basically, you are making a roadmap for the passage. You know where to look
when asked. When you have a fairly clear idea how the passage is structured,
you know what point the author is trying to make and how he makes it. When you
have established your systematic reading approach, you rarely need to go back
to the passage to answer global questions such as main idea, main purpose,
author's attitude and structure. You will find it is easier to answer inference
questions (most difficult RC questions) because you have a whole picture. You
will know where to look when you are asked about a specific detail.

        

It's impossible to memorize all the details and you will get lost trying to
remember them.

        

Study the explaination of Kaplan coming with every test. That's the proven way
to read. If you visit LSAT forums of US students, every test taker hit 99
percentile (>173) would tell you the same thing: structure and taking notes on the
side. Like marking MP? on the side of any sentences that look like the main point; C
for critic; A for author; Def for definition of a key term; 1,2,3, a,b,c for
numeration of lists; double arrow for contrasting points...etc. You get the
idea.

        

With practice, it will click. There is a mechanical way to attack LSAT
passages. Follow the principle; develop your own marking system.

        

Of course, you need to solve any problems related to vocabulary and difficult
sentences first.

One more tip I learned the hard way: always go back to the passage to check your answer for a detail question. NEVER answer it with your vague impression.

作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-9-28 04:23
hey, thank you so much for your replies!!! Reaperowlish and icewarm!! They're quite helpful!!
Thank you!!
Good luck with you two!

作者: tysce    时间: 2007-10-5 17:05
结构固然重要,但是很多情况你犯错误反而是因为细节没有弄清楚,导致误解结构或者含含糊糊。我认为这两个必须以同等分量同时进行。
作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-10-5 23:16
可是根本记不住细节啊
作者: tysce    时间: 2007-10-7 22:25
你读得太快了可能。阅读时要做记号,实在记不住的话,在读完每段后用简短语言给该段落写个小总结。
作者: 况天佑    时间: 2007-10-9 22:43

逻辑,逻辑永远是第一位的


作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-10-10 11:03
sigh
今天和研究生班上的小美们讨论了一下
惊喜地发现几乎每个人都考过lsat
他们说,阅读对他们很简单
和sat得很像~
基本上他们都不用准备,直接都上去了
还说,我们外国人,要注意read between the lines
要读逻辑,记细节,判断框架,还要read between the lines
真不是人干的活儿

作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-10-10 11:04
刚才那个帖子没有什么技术含量
纯粹抱怨贴
大家没时间,就不要看了啊!
sigh

作者: icewarm    时间: 2007-10-10 14:07
Actually, RC is the hardest part for most of US students too. Those who consistently get >170 in their preptests usually miss 3 ~ 4. Others are not that different from Chinese students. They miss 4~9.





作者: hellokelly    时间: 2007-10-11 01:44
谢谢icewarm :)





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3