做完了OG11了,还是感觉对逻辑有种说不出的感觉·····哎 =觉得自己还是没有把握其思路。比方说这道题目,我觉得很简单,可是就是不知道卡在哪了,钻不出来,前辈们帮忙下吧!!初涉此道,大家多多帮忙了 ~!@!@#
1.为什么A和E选择E呢??
2.对于一个“前提---结论”的 结构,我们可以削弱“前提”吗?也就是说这题,我们可以削弱“A greater number of newspapers are sold in Town S than in Town T.”吗?
67. A greater number of newspapers are sold in Town S than in Town T. Therefore, the citizens of Town S are better informed about major world events than are the citizens of Town T.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion above EXCEPT:
(A) Town S has a larger population than Town T.
(B) Most citizens of Town T work in Town S and buy their newspapers there.
(C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T.
(D) A weekly newspaper restricted to the coverage of local events is published in Town S.
E
(E) The average newsstand price of newspapers sold in Town S in lower than the average price of newspapers sold in Town T.
新东方的老师说,削弱前提是无效的。应该在承认其前提的情况下,找出令其结论成立的可能性降低的选项。
这道题,the citizens of Town S are better informed about major world events than are the citizens of Town T,应该是说一个平均的情况。A选项说Town S人口多,因此尽管消费更多的报纸,仍不能说明结论,实际上削弱了结论存在的可能性。
E选项纯属无关,原文讨论的是报纸的销售量,和价格没有关系。故选E。
谢谢楼上的解释啊··不过还是有点迷糊好像,
其他朋友再给点想法呀@!@@@
A选项有关。因为S城人口比T城人口多,所以尽管S城报纸销量更大,但仍不能说明S城人均获得国际信息量大这个结论,是削弱。
E选项谈论价格,但原文已经告诉你S城报纸销量比T城大(前提条件),价格的高低就没有影响了,因此无关。
似乎了解了,你的意思是不是说“S城人口比T城人口多”与结论(S城人均获得国际信息量大)有关,而“价格的高低”与结论(S城人均获得国际信息量大)完全无关。?
还想弱弱问下,为什么这么貌似简单的原因我却这么久才转过来哩····??
呵呵 谢谢!其实CD为大家提供了交流的平台,我只是尽自己之力为别人提供一点谨供参考的思路而已,过奖啦~
同祝你也考个好成绩!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |