ChaseDream

标题: TTGWD20-3 重开一贴～对这题我还有疑问 [打印本页]

作者: foreverhour 时间: 2007-9-19 10:02
标题: TTGWD20-3 重开一贴～对这题我还有疑问

Q3:

The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.

rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room
rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through triage in a hospital emergency room
rules intending to ensure at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage
with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage
and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

答案是A.

我觉得A没错，但是我很想知道E错在哪里？and this is 不可以指代前一句么？one nurse at least 我怎么觉得也有这样的说法呢？put through triage 是作为过去分词来修饰patients么？请NN解疑。

作者: elinaqu 时间: 2007-9-19 11:09

1 is intended这个被动很怪异啊？是谁发出来的动作啊？用被动要有明确标志

2 one nurse at least 的话就不是说至少one nurse，而是说 one nurse至少被assigned for...这个动作了，没有at least one nurse 好

3 我觉得put through triage是修饰patients的

4 还有我觉得A和E比较的时候我想到的是，ETS是很喜欢重复一下名词的这种方式，OG里也有不少例子

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-19 11:10:09编辑过]

作者: MGi_Rei 时间: 2007-9-19 11:12
and前后应该在不违背逻辑思义的前提下，尽可能的对成，但是E中的This有问题的，带前面正句话？破坏对成，且语法上这样指代不太好，如果想带rules，则this的单数形式也是错的

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)