ChaseDream

标题: PREP SC No.69 关于intent of sth及intent to do sth [打印本页]

作者: vivian_huang 时间: 2007-9-16 16:37
标题: PREP SC No.69 关于intent of sth及intent to do sth

Hi，今天看PREP SC 笔记（各位版主整理的PDF ）

遇到69题时，

69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling （正确答案）

(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell ==》笔记里说，intent to sell 错，其中原因是因为to do 是修饰动作的，而这里前面没有动词可以修饰，所以错。。。

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

还是不太理解，就查了google，结果如下：

Letter of Intent to Adopt Special Needs Child

NATO Notification of Intent to Invite Bids for International ...

感觉都是没有动词的，但是都用了intent to这样的用法。。。

那位能够进一步解释什么时候用intent of sth? 什么时候用 intent to do sth?

谢谢啦！！！

PS: 版主，鉴于PDF版本的prep语法笔记实在很好，能不能为其开另外的讨论总结呢？毕竟后面可能很多人都用这个版本的。。。

现在实在很不方便啊

作者: mattgzhang5 时间: 2007-9-16 21:56
我觉得D错在句子结构啰嗦和‘it'指代不清. proliferation...led to "ACT", which..., AND it allows.......

作者: vivian_huang 时间: 2007-9-16 22:30

以下是引用mattgzhang5在2007-9-16 21:56:00的发言：
我觉得D错在句子结构啰嗦和‘it'指代不清. proliferation...led to "ACT", which..., AND it allows.......

....我就是特别希望知道intent of sth 和 intent to do sth的区别和用法：）

作者: zhujinbo 时间: 2009-1-18 21:30
本质上,和这个词是不是intent, 还有什么动词名词没有关系
关键是看整个句子, 强调的是宾语 (所谓的名词.e.g. intent), 还是强调的谓语的目的性.
如果强调宾语,则用of doing.

所以, 抛开intent的束缚, 去看本质

作者: 毛毛怪 时间: 2011-2-23 22:06
我认为D之所以错误是因为with+名词+to do结构的独立主格形式，介宾结构是就近修饰的前面names，不符合逻辑，而with intent of doing是修饰的谓语

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)