ChaseDream

标题: 大全-11-9,讨论 [打印本页]

作者: rac111    时间: 2007-9-13 16:22
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: 没有人    时间: 2009-9-11 20:06
同疑惑
作者: hlp1222    时间: 2009-9-14 17:02

怎么搞的 都没人回答

虽然我用排除法写对了

但是对于选项E还是很疑惑

望解答


作者: Dongkailun    时间: 2011-8-13 16:22
求解答 我在 c e里徘徊
作者: Dongkailun    时间: 2011-8-13 16:24
不过后面想了想 既然有c的话 那就不用再多此一举的在机场和小城市之间开通快速列车了。所以排除!
作者: irenejz    时间: 2012-11-20 21:34
TEST 5-7
7.    A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport congestion is to provide high-speed ground transportation between major cities lying 200 to 500 miles apart. The successful implementation of this plan would cost far less than expanding existing airports and would also reduce the number of airplanes clogging both airports and airways.
Which of the following, if true, could proponents of the plan above most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for the soundness of their plan?
(A) An effective high-speed ground-transportation system would require major repairs to many highways and mass-transit improvements.
(B) One-half of all departing flights in the nation’s busiest airport head for a destination in a major city 225 miles away.
(C) The majority of travelers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 600 miles away.
(D) Many new airports are being built in areas that are presently served by high-speed ground-transportation systems.
(E) A large proportion of air travelers are vacationers who are taking long-distance flights.

OA:B
我觉得这道题跟上面那道似乎有些类似(除了cost这个问题外),可为啥同为support但答案似乎完全不是一个逻辑咧,好晕呀?

那位朋友能帮忙解释区分一下这两题吗?
作者: irenejz    时间: 2012-11-20 21:48
等等,11-9那道是指那些国际航班的乘客最后要到small cities吗?如果是的话就好像理解了。
很多international flights在airport转机到small cities,造成airport交通拥挤,如果可以用train把他们送到small cities的话,那就可以在很大一部分上减少了去small cities的航班。 这样的话,两道的逻辑似乎是一样的。
是不是这个意思呢?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3